CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Grid Interfaces

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   January 11, 2010, 00:15
Default Grid Interfaces
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 7
soggy316 is on a distinguished road
I am solving a case where a flow is past a vibrating cylinder. After much heartburn, I have got the dynamic mesh working for a small rectangular neighborhood around the cylinder, the rest of the domain being stationary. As a result, I have to define interfaces between the two zones.

Now when I create a grid interface FLUENT creates a wall at that location. and I do not require that as the the two zones are the same fluid.

Is there a way to prevent the creation of those walls?
soggy316 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 11, 2010, 01:20
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
-mAx-'s Avatar
 
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 2,789
Rep Power: 28
-mAx- will become famous soon enough
you should create your interfaces in Gambit (2 superposed interfaces set as 2 separated interfaces --> interface_1 and interface_2)
Then in Fluent, go and define interface as one set, say interface_A, and choose interface_1 and interface_2.
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider
-mAx- is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 11, 2010, 02:51
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
herntan's Avatar
 
YH Tan
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 118
Rep Power: 7
herntan is on a distinguished road
cannot understand what u trying to do. Please post picture and describe more detail.
__________________
Herntan,

Add Reputation if I am right
herntan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 11, 2010, 04:33
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 7
soggy316 is on a distinguished road
Here is a screenshot of my problem domain



I create 2 mesh files

The yellow box around the circle is the boundary between the two mesh files

The common boundaries of both meshes are set to "interface" boundary condition.

the grid is assembled using tmerge

Now I bring the entire mesh into fluent, and assign grid interfaces as left, right, top, bottom, using the overlapping interface boundaries of both meshes

Now, when I do this , it creates a number of walls at the interface location, which totally screws up the flow solution.

My question is - how do I create the grid interface such that either no walls are created, or how do I delete/deactivate these walls that have been created automatically
soggy316 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 11, 2010, 04:57
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
herntan's Avatar
 
YH Tan
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 118
Rep Power: 7
herntan is on a distinguished road
soggy,

Grid interface will only useful on 2 touching surface (not common one) and after create grid interface, this 2 surface will allow fluid flow through each other.

For your case , if its a common surface, change it to "interior" then the flow can pass through each other already.

If u want to have movement of the yellow box, u need to create 2 surface touching like i said in order for the touching surface sliding on each other.

hope this helps.
__________________
Herntan,

Add Reputation if I am right
herntan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 11, 2010, 05:05
Default
  #6
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 7
soggy316 is on a distinguished road
^ so as I understand it, you are saying that I cannot have an interface between two fluid zones in fluent.

The issue that I am facing is that the circle moves up and down inside the yellow box, the mesh in the yellow box is thus deforming, but the surrounding mesh is stationary, so at the border , the mesh will be non-conformal, so I went for grid interfaces.

If fluid-fluid interfaces cannot be created, then does anyone have any idea on how to get the remeshing option to work in dynamic meshes?
soggy316 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 11, 2010, 12:32
Default
  #7
Super Moderator
 
-mAx-'s Avatar
 
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 2,789
Rep Power: 28
-mAx- will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by soggy316 View Post
^ so as I understand it, you are saying that I cannot have an interface between two fluid zones in fluent.

The issue that I am facing is that the circle moves up and down inside the yellow box, the mesh in the yellow box is thus deforming, but the surrounding mesh is stationary, so at the border , the mesh will be non-conformal, so I went for grid interfaces.

If fluid-fluid interfaces cannot be created, then does anyone have any idea on how to get the remeshing option to work in dynamic meshes?
what you are trying to do seem to be ok from my side.
If your motion is a translation, I would let move your box (and the fluid domain inside, as rigid body), and use remeshing option (--> no need interfaces).
But your model should work (you set up 4 interfaces pair).
Can you provide the .dbs file (from Gambit)
Why are the outter edges of the big domain yellow?
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider
-mAx- is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 14, 2010, 20:36
Default
  #8
Senior Member
 
herntan's Avatar
 
YH Tan
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 118
Rep Power: 7
herntan is on a distinguished road
soggy,

i guess you have to post more picture on what u trying to do with pointer pointing out how u set it.

i agree with -Max- comment on having ur box as rigid body.

another method is setup interface pair. u need to change ur gambit model and break up the common surface then create interface out of it.
__________________
Herntan,

Add Reputation if I am right
herntan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 14, 2010, 22:24
Default
  #9
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 7
soggy316 is on a distinguished road
sorry for the delayed response...

The flow simulation is working with the setup that I have created (with four interface pairs) I was getting confused because Fluent-Post was screwing up the streamline plot, the vector plot confirms that the fluid is able to flow through the interface without problems.

Thanks for your help - herntan and -max-
soggy316 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 2, 2010, 20:53
Default
  #10
New Member
 
fanbin
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 6
alex-fan is on a distinguished road
your job is great can you email a example of dynamic mesh thank you verymuch
alex-fan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 10, 2010, 11:44
Default
  #11
Senior Member
 
Herman
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 122
Rep Power: 6
enry is on a distinguished road
Hi Soggy,
I also use interface between 2 portion of fluid: moving and stationary fluid.
I also noted that FLUENT creates 2 new wall, that is mentioned in User manual, but I don't understand if I have to change the boundary conditions that FLUENT assign to the new walls. Flow go through the interface, so I realized that everything is correct, but I would like to know why FLUENT create that walls.
Thanks.
enry is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 4, 2012, 01:40
Default Moving mesh inside another mesh
  #12
New Member
 
Zhi Wei Sok
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
zwsok is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by -mAx- View Post
what you are trying to do seem to be ok from my side.
If your motion is a translation, I would let move your box (and the fluid domain inside, as rigid body), and use remeshing option (--> no need interfaces).
But your model should work (you set up 4 interfaces pair).
Can you provide the .dbs file (from Gambit)
Why are the outter edges of the big domain yellow?
Hi all,

I just saw this suggestion on the forum and would like to consult people on the following problem:

I am currently working on a moving airfoil (translational and rotational). Since I need resolution near the airfoil as I want to observe vortex shedding, I would like the mesh around it to be structured and preferably fixed. The motions will be accommodated by the unstructured mesh outside the structured one, with smoothing and remeshing applied to it.

I am working on Fluent and the Design Modeler and Mesher from ANSYS workbench. Should I build 2 meshes or one? And how do I make one move and have the other one respond accordingly?

Your help will be so very much appreciated. Thanks!

Regards,
Sok
zwsok is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 17, 2012, 05:17
Default
  #13
Senior Member
 
Samuele Z
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Mozzate - Co - Italy
Posts: 446
Rep Power: 8
samiam1000 is on a distinguished road
Dear Friends,

I read very carefully this thread and I have found it very useful.

I have some questions for you: first of all, I would like to know which solvers can be used to threat a moving mesh. I would need a multi-region domain solver, is it possible?

Also, one more point: is it possible - instead using moveDynamicMesh - to create 10 different meshes (with the fluent mesher) and then to perform a simulation on those meshes? If so, how can I pass the solution at time n as initial guess at time (n+1)? This could be a challenging point, since the meshes are differet at each time step.

I think that's all for now. Thanks for the help you will provide.

Samuele
samiam1000 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
grid interfaces kiko FLUENT 0 February 13, 2007 10:28
Grid interfaces in Fluent Omar Qazi FLUENT 1 January 28, 2006 18:55
Non-Conformal Grid Interfaces Sridhar FLUENT 0 May 3, 2002 03:04
Combustion Convergence problems Art Stretton Phoenics 5 April 2, 2002 04:59
Numerical methods for discontinuous grid interfaces? Hansong Hang Main CFD Forum 12 September 16, 1998 22:26


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:19.