CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Fluent converting 'wall' to 'interior' BC for hybrid mesh

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By -mAx-

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   February 23, 2010, 00:21
Default Fluent converting 'wall' to 'interior' BC for hybrid mesh
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 69
Rep Power: 8
DarrenC is on a distinguished road
Hi everyone,

I am having a problem converting a 'wall' boundary condition in between my mesh interface of my hybrid grid to type 'interior'. I have a mesh interface surface in between my hex and tet mesh. When I imported my mesh into fluent, the interface becomes 2 different boundaries (foil and foil-shadow). When I try to change any one of these boundaries from a 'wall' type to a 'interior' type, The following error message occurs :

'Cannot change foil-shadow to interior because adjacent cell threads are of different types.'

The message is quite clear but I fail to understand why it is a problem. I have done this in a 2D geometry before and it worked fine but now I am working on a 3D geometry and it throws up this error.

FYI i use ICEM to do my grid and I use edit mesh>merge nodes>merge meshes to merge my tet and hex mesh together.

Could this problem be due to ICEM not merging the interface properly, or is it just Fluent not being able to handle interfaces where mesh elements are of a different kind?

Hope someone can shed some light into this for me.

Thanks in advance

DarrenC is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 23, 2010, 03:18
Super Moderator
-mAx-'s Avatar
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,066
Rep Power: 31
-mAx- will become famous soon enough
Check your 2D model (which worked fine) because what you are trying to do isn't possible, and it should also fail in 2d (as in 3d).
The only possibility to connect 2 non-connected-Mesh, is to work with interfaces.
So define your interfaces as INTERFACE Boundary Type, and then in fluent your have to set them: define/interface
sircorp likes this.
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider
-mAx- is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 23, 2010, 03:40
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 69
Rep Power: 8
DarrenC is on a distinguished road
Hi Max

Thanks for your reply. As for my problem, I have just found it and it is a really silly one. I have one zone defined as solid and the other one as a fluid. =)

As for my mesh, the mesh from both zones are connected at the nodes and edges, so i did not use an interface.

Thanks anyway

DarrenC is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 19, 2011, 07:04
Default yes it can be done
New Member
alejandro alonzo garcia
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: mexico D.F.
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 7
alejandro_1980 is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to alejandro_1980
well, you can convert a unnecesary wall solid boundary result of the coupling between two volume meshes with the fuse faces tool of fluent. in case that you have just one unnecesary face, you can slit that face with slit face zone command, then, you r going to have two faces in the same positions, after that, you can fuse that two faces to form an interior unique face.. cheers =)
alejandro_1980 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 9, 2014, 08:52
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 3
Traction is on a distinguished road

i had a similar problem and found an easy solution to this issue.
i work with ICEM (for CFD) and generated a hybrid mesh consisting of a tet refinement area and a hex farfield - between them i used surfaces to build a conformal interface in ICEM.

fluent sorted this surfaces as an interface boundary - but to create a regular interface boundary you need more than 1 surface (can lead to potential problems in icem).

after finishing the mesh in ICEM i deleted the not required surfaces and sent the mesh to fluent.

afaik this works well for that kind of hybrid mesh !
Traction is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 23, 2014, 17:52
New Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: new jersey
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 4
chandrasekhar is on a distinguished road
does anyone know how to impose a wall boundary condition on the interface between two bodies.My setup is as follows,
it has two bodies. it consists of a hollow aluminium pipe which has an inlet an and outlet, the other body is a copper rod which is partially inserted in the middle of the aluminium pipe and acts as an obstruction. i am doing this in 2D.

when i imported the mesh in Fluent and ran the simulation, fluent considered the common boundary as interface and the flow went through the copper obstruction. Do i have to impose some condition in the the Mesher for the fluent to recognize it as a wall. Any help on this would be greatly appreciated. Many thanks for replying.

with regards
Chandra sekhar
chandrasekhar is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 6, 2014, 06:00
New Member
Ibrahim Ciftci
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
iciftci.42 is on a distinguished road
thanx for reply..
iciftci.42 is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wall function problem in Fluent mefpz FLUENT 1 October 10, 2007 13:43
slow after mesh for enhanced wall treat DPM joshkemp FLUENT 0 May 1, 2007 17:20
prob while exporting icem cfd hexa mesh to fluent mani CFX 4 March 7, 2007 04:41
How to control Minximum mesh space? hung FLUENT 7 April 18, 2005 09:38
what the result is negatif pressure at inlet chong chee nan FLUENT 0 December 29, 2001 06:13

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:42.