CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

hel (turbulent viscosity ratio limited) for supersonic combustion problem

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   March 11, 2010, 07:24
Default hel (turbulent viscosity ratio limited) for supersonic combustion problem
  #1
New Member
 
Omar
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 7
omar.2002bh is on a distinguished road
hey all,

Problem description:

I'm trying to model the supersonic flow in a 2D scramjet combustor. I used a configuration as a mid-injection of H2 at sonic conditions (M=1) and a Mach 2 freestream conditions. The inlet inputs can be found at the end. I used the k-epsilon turbulence model since the turbulent kinetic energy and dissipation rate are given in the experiment ( where I got the information of the inlet from ). I used a non-premixed combustion with specifying all the data and calculating the PDF table for the present problem. The mesh is really fine ( I think fine enough ) and do not think the problem relies there, so I think my turbulent BCs are somewhat wrong. I also specified the exit plane as a pressure outlet, but got a reversed flow there too. There are many issues with the simulation so if someone has good ideas of a way to get rid of the errors please let me know. Many thanks and please find the inputs below.

So my questions now are:

1- How to get rid of the turbulent viscosity ratio?
2- What is the best turbulence model for the imposed problem?
3- Shall I change the turbulent BCs to something like Hydraulic diameter and intensity ?
4- How to get rid of the reversed flow? I'm still not clear of how to specify the backflow conditions.
5- Shall I increase the limit of the viscosity ratio ? or is that unrealistic?
6- How can I calculate the mean mixture fraction of both fuel and air? The user manual does not provide a formula for this.

I need some help please. Thanks to all.

Air / Hydrogen
Mach number 2 / 1
u m/s) 730 / 1200
T (K) 340 / 250
P (10^5 Pa) 1 / 1
density (kg/m^3) 1.002 / 0.097
mass fraction (O2) 0.232 / 0
mass fraction (N2) 0.736 / 0
mass fraction (H2O) 0.032/ 0
mass fraction (H2) 0 / 1
k (m^2/s^2) 10 / 2400
epsilon (m^2/s^3) 650 / 10^8
omar.2002bh is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 20, 2010, 04:41
Default Hi Omar
  #2
CPT
New Member
 
C T
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 6
CPT is on a distinguished road
Just curious if you have got any results as I too am doing something similar

CPT
CPT is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 5, 2012, 11:04
Default Which user manual u referring to
  #3
New Member
 
Peter P
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: India
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
CFDcomprookie is on a distinguished road
Just out of curiosity which user manual u wre referring to?
CFDcomprookie is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
turbulent viscosity ratio for jet serpil FLUENT 3 September 19, 2014 06:19
Turbulent viscosity Limited to viscosity ratio Adrian FLUENT 12 September 21, 2011 04:22
About Turbulent Viscosity Ratio Limit... Fabio FLUENT 1 August 7, 2008 15:40
turbulent viscosity ratio on a large duct newbie FLUENT 4 March 7, 2008 17:05
Turbulent Viscosity Ratio xiang FLUENT 3 May 20, 2003 12:46


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:42.