CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Fin inside supersonic flow

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   March 16, 2010, 17:52
Default Fin inside supersonic flow
  #1
New Member
 
Liol Calvert
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Poitiers, France
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
Liol Calvert is on a distinguished road
Hi,
As a project to end our studies in engineering in Poitiers (France), we had to modelize the behavior of a fin inside a supersonic flow (Mach 5).

First, we wanted to know the temperature,pressure and velocity conditions near the fin. Here is a picture of the modelisation :

As you can see, the fin is on the right, not meshed, surrounded by the chock wave.

We solved this situation for the 3 seconds-long flight, with a time step of 0.001 s, in order to know the temperatures into the boundary layer.
Next step was to mesh the fin (so we will have 2 faces, one solid and one fluid), to chararacterize the heating of the fin, knowing flux correlations on the fin boundaries.

Here his our modelization :

We've got these named selections :
solid
fluid
inlet
wall-fluid (automatically created by fluent)
wall1 (where correlations must be applied)
wall2

We tried to write an UDF to use boundrary layer temperatures into correlations, but we never made it to work. in Wall1, we choose the UDF in thermal conditions, but the fin doesn't see its temperature increase, and convergence criteria is very very high (quite impossible to go under 1E-2).

Here is the code we wrote, with a very simple correlation to try to make it work.

Code:
#include "udf.h"

DEFINE_PROFILE(temperature,thread,index)
{
real x[ND_ND];
real y;
face_t f;

begin_f_loop (f,thread)
    {
    real T= C_T(f,thread);
    F_CENTROID(x,f,thread);
        F_PROFILE(f,thread,index)= 100*(300-C_T(f,thread));
    }
end_f_loop (f,thread)
}
We had to use Fluent (told by our project director), yet we hadn't any formation on this software (Ansys Workbench 12). We're used to work with Matlab, so, even with the Ansys User Guide and Tutorial, it's pretty hard to do anything with valuable content...
Liol Calvert is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 18, 2010, 14:17
Default Free Stream velocity
  #2
New Member
 
Srikrishna
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 6
krishna086 is on a distinguished road
Hi,

Just curious. I am modeling a similar kind of geometry. But this is incompressible flow. Do you know any method to specify the free stream conditions.

Also let me what options for Density, Viscosity, Thermal Conductivity, and Cp you chose while simulating your model.

Thanks.
krishna086 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 18, 2010, 14:53
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Liol Calvert
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Poitiers, France
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
Liol Calvert is on a distinguished road
Hi,

We chose to specify "Pressure farfield", on Inlet, to specify the free stream to 5 mach and 1013 Pa.

For the others parameters, we let the default values chosen by Fluent, excepted the fluid nature, which was "ideal gas"
Liol Calvert is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 18, 2010, 20:56
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Srikrishna
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 6
krishna086 is on a distinguished road
Thank u Liol. But the pressure far field BC is only for compressible flows. That is where the problem is. I am dealing with incompressible flows.

If u come to know any other BC for Mach < 0.3 , let me know.
krishna086 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 19, 2010, 03:10
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 7
denizen is on a distinguished road
i think conjugate heat transfer will be better.
denizen is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 19, 2010, 07:23
Default
  #6
New Member
 
Srikrishna
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 6
krishna086 is on a distinguished road
Thanks denizen. So when you say conjugate heat transfer, you mean to sandwich the wall between two adjacent fluid zones.

Let me know.
krishna086 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 19, 2010, 09:16
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 7
denizen is on a distinguished road
it means energy equation will solved everywhere in domain (solid - fin and fluid - gas) and heat transfer on the wall will be automaticaly accounted
denizen is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 19, 2010, 13:01
Default
  #8
New Member
 
Srikrishna
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 6
krishna086 is on a distinguished road
ok. I got u. But I thought you are giving a solution to my problem of BC. My problem is about the outer boundary declaration in case of subsonic flows.

Because if I restrict the flow field inside a defined domain, the no slip on walls causes flow retardation to the bulk of the flow and thus produces different results when compared to a wedge situated in a free stream flow. (flow at infinity).

Let me know if you have an answer to this problem.

Thanks.
krishna086 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 22, 2010, 10:31
Default
  #9
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 7
denizen is on a distinguished road
could you explaine more detailed?
denizen is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
supersonic flow arround fin stabilized missile jon william FLUENT 1 December 4, 2006 09:29
problem in initializing the flow for supersonic jon william FLUENT 0 October 30, 2006 08:16
supersonic flow Steffen FLUENT 4 January 3, 2005 16:54
linearized supersonic flow on airfoils kharati Main CFD Forum 1 January 7, 2004 07:08
meshing F1 front wing Steve FLUENT 0 April 17, 2003 12:37


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:30.