CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

AOA adjustment in CFD compuation.

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   May 25, 2010, 04:53
Smile AOA adjustment in CFD compuation.
  #1
New Member
 
Luolin
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
llbai@hotmail.com is on a distinguished road
I had a look at the fluent tutorials at http://courses.cit.cornell.edu/fluent/airfoil/index.htm. I noticed that AOA 1.2 instead of 2 were used to calculate the actual AOA 2. It was explained as a 2d adjustment. ("Note that 1.2 is used as our angle of attack instead of 2 to adjust for the error caused by assuming the airfoil to be 2D instead of 3D.").

Could someone tell me how the 0.8 offset is decided? Is there any theory to support this?

Thanks in advance. Your reply is really appreciated.
llbai@hotmail.com is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 13, 2013, 06:53
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Ali
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Turkey
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 4
mct90 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by llbai@hotmail.com View Post
I had a look at the fluent tutorials at http://courses.cit.cornell.edu/fluent/airfoil/index.htm. I noticed that AOA 1.2 instead of 2 were used to calculate the actual AOA 2. It was explained as a 2d adjustment. ("Note that 1.2 is used as our angle of attack instead of 2 to adjust for the error caused by assuming the airfoil to be 2D instead of 3D.").

Could someone tell me how the 0.8 offset is decided? Is there any theory to support this?

Thanks in advance. Your reply is really appreciated.
I want to ask the same question. I am searching but i couldn't find yet. For example ,If angle of attack is 4, which degree must be use?
mct90 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 13, 2013, 08:46
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
OJ
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: United Kindom
Posts: 475
Rep Power: 11
oj.bulmer will become famous soon enough
The 2D simulation of airfoil assumes that the width of airfoil wing in thierd direction is infinite, and the flow in the third direction is zero. While, in 3D (and reality) the width is finite and there is a finite flow in 3rd direction. Hence, for same inlet velocities, the lift for 2D will be always higher than ones from 3D and hence to realize the same effect of 2deg on 3D wing, the 2D wing uses smaller angle.

There is some explanation provided here to estimate how these different values of angle of attack are related.

http://www.mh-aerotools.de/airfoils/hdi_aoawing.htm

OJ
oj.bulmer is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 13, 2013, 15:50
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Ali
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Turkey
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 4
mct90 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by oj.bulmer View Post
The 2D simulation of airfoil assumes that the width of airfoil wing in thierd direction is infinite, and the flow in the third direction is zero. While, in 3D (and reality) the width is finite and there is a finite flow in 3rd direction. Hence, for same inlet velocities, the lift for 2D will be always higher than ones from 3D and hence to realize the same effect of 2deg on 3D wing, the 2D wing uses smaller angle.

There is some explanation provided here to estimate how these different values of angle of attack are related.

http://www.mh-aerotools.de/airfoils/hdi_aoawing.htm

OJ
Thank you for the response. It was very helpful.
mct90 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
STAR-Works : Mainstream CAD with CFD CD adapco Group Marketing CD-adapco 0 February 13, 2002 13:23
Where do we go from here? CFD in 2001 John C. Chien Main CFD Forum 36 January 24, 2001 22:10
ASME CFD Symposium, Atlanta, July 2001 Chris R. Kleijn Main CFD Forum 0 August 21, 2000 04:49
Which is better to develop in-house CFD code or to buy a available CFD package. Tareq Al-shaalan Main CFD Forum 10 June 12, 1999 23:27
public CFD Code development Heinz Wilkening Main CFD Forum 38 March 5, 1999 12:44


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:21.