# Issue with volume fraction

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 June 7, 2010, 15:24 Issue with volume fraction #1 Member     Pranab N Jha Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Houston, TX Posts: 83 Rep Power: 7 Hi All, I am trying to simulate two-phase flow with air and water in a pipe to get slug flow. My issue is that when I initialize the domain with VF = 1 (completely filled with water) and then let the fluids flow into the system, I get the error: "divergence detected in AMG solver: pressure correction" But when I initialize with VF = 0 (complete air), I do not get the error. Can somebody please explain to me the physics behind it? Also, what is the remedy for this? I am guessing that the air is not able to push through the water when the domain is completely filled with water. Am I correct? My flow velocities are not very high: 1.2 m/s for air and 0.1 m/s for water which leaves me with 0.6 m/s for air and 0.05 m/s for water as the superficial velocities at the inlet (I have split the inlet into two halves- one for each phase). Pipe dia is 50 mm. Replies and suggestions welcome. Cheers, Pranab

 June 10, 2010, 16:44 #2 Member     Pranab N Jha Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Houston, TX Posts: 83 Rep Power: 7 Hi All, I could get a flow for low inlet velocities of air and water with initialization of volume fraction= 0.5 in the whole domain. But still, the problem persists with higher phase velocities (air = 2m/s and water = 1.4 m/s). Can anyone tell me how low can I go with the relaxation factor for the pressure correction in the AMG solver? Any suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks, Pranab

 June 25, 2010, 17:26 #3 Member     Pranab N Jha Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Houston, TX Posts: 83 Rep Power: 7 I would myself go ahead here and let everybody know that the AMG pressure correction problem was solved by using 3ddp instead of fluent 3d. I read somewhere on the internet that if your maximum cell volume is less than 1e-6 cu. m., then you have to use 3ddp to get over the pressure correction problem. I cannot validate this claim, but it did work for me.

 Tags two-phase flow, vof

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post gaottino OpenFOAM Native Meshers: blockMesh 7 July 19, 2010 14:11 gopala OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 April 27, 2009 10:46 paean OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 November 14, 2008 22:14 SSL FLUENT 2 January 26, 2008 12:55 Rasmus Gjesing (Gjesing) OpenFOAM Native Meshers: blockMesh 10 April 2, 2007 14:00

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:11.