CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Issue with volume fraction

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   June 7, 2010, 15:24
Default Issue with volume fraction
  #1
Member
 
pranab_jha's Avatar
 
Pranab N Jha
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 83
Rep Power: 7
pranab_jha is on a distinguished road
Hi All,
I am trying to simulate two-phase flow with air and water in a pipe to get slug flow. My issue is that when I initialize the domain with VF = 1 (completely filled with water) and then let the fluids flow into the system, I get the error:
"divergence detected in AMG solver: pressure correction"
But when I initialize with VF = 0 (complete air), I do not get the error.

Can somebody please explain to me the physics behind it? Also, what is the remedy for this? I am guessing that the air is not able to push through the water when the domain is completely filled with water. Am I correct?

My flow velocities are not very high: 1.2 m/s for air and 0.1 m/s for water which leaves me with 0.6 m/s for air and 0.05 m/s for water as the superficial velocities at the inlet (I have split the inlet into two halves- one for each phase). Pipe dia is 50 mm.

Replies and suggestions welcome.

Cheers,
Pranab
pranab_jha is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 10, 2010, 16:44
Default
  #2
Member
 
pranab_jha's Avatar
 
Pranab N Jha
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 83
Rep Power: 7
pranab_jha is on a distinguished road
Hi All,
I could get a flow for low inlet velocities of air and water with initialization of volume fraction= 0.5 in the whole domain. But still, the problem persists with higher phase velocities (air = 2m/s and water = 1.4 m/s).
Can anyone tell me how low can I go with the relaxation factor for the pressure correction in the AMG solver?
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Pranab
pranab_jha is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 25, 2010, 17:26
Default
  #3
Member
 
pranab_jha's Avatar
 
Pranab N Jha
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 83
Rep Power: 7
pranab_jha is on a distinguished road
I would myself go ahead here and let everybody know that the AMG pressure correction problem was solved by using 3ddp instead of fluent 3d. I read somewhere on the internet that if your maximum cell volume is less than 1e-6 cu. m., then you have to use 3ddp to get over the pressure correction problem. I cannot validate this claim, but it did work for me.
pranab_jha is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
two-phase flow, vof

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BlockMesh FOAM warning gaottino OpenFOAM Native Meshers: blockMesh 7 July 19, 2010 14:11
interDyMFoam - change in volume fraction gopala OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 April 27, 2009 10:46
On the damBreak4phaseFine cases paean OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 November 14, 2008 22:14
fluent add additional zones for the mesh file SSL FLUENT 2 January 26, 2008 12:55
Axisymmetrical mesh Rasmus Gjesing (Gjesing) OpenFOAM Native Meshers: blockMesh 10 April 2, 2007 14:00


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:11.