CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

MIcrochannels.

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   July 4, 2010, 15:01
Default MIcrochannels.
  #1
New Member
 
Amir
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: The UK
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
abadiee is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to abadiee
I am simulating microchannels in FLUENT. I have a single channels with rectangular crosssection. Hydrolic diameter is 0.0015, Length is 1 cm.
BC: Inlet> Velocity inlet
Outlet> Outflow
Bottom wall > Heat flux: 100000 w/m2, Th:0.0005m
Upper and side walls: Adiabatic, Th:0.0005m
But What I get in pressure contour is negative pressure inside the channel which does not make any sense.
Can I have your opinions on the issue please.
abadiee is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 4, 2010, 16:19
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
karine
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 158
Rep Power: 7
thecfduser is on a distinguished road
Hi
the pressure in the N.S equation appears as a gradient. What is important, in an incompressible flow, is the pressure difference and not the pressure.
The pressure will depend on the point in wich u choose the reference pressure (in operating pressure window of Fluent).
Anyway, i think ure simulation is not well posed.
Choose pressure outlet instead of outflow, with pressure=0 on that boundary.
U will get positive pressure inside the microchannel, and ure simulation will be good.
thecfduser is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 4, 2010, 17:10
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Amir
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: The UK
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
abadiee is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to abadiee
Thank you.
The problem with pressure outlet is that the fluid is not going to atmosphere pressure. It is in a closed circle and I choose outflow to see how much the outlet pressure is. When I choose pressure outlet with 0 Pascal. the outlet pressure is 0 which is not sensible. Even I changed the operation condition but no changed in negative pressure. The gradient is absolutely correct but how can I have the absolute pressure?
abadiee is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 4, 2010, 17:30
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
karine
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 158
Rep Power: 7
thecfduser is on a distinguished road
With outflow, u assume that ure fluid tempearture dont change anymore at the outlet...(dT/dx=0)....
When u put outlet pressure with 0 Pa, it is the gauge pressure that is 0. To get the absolute pressure, u must know the pressure at least in a point of ure domain (the pressure biggest derivative is 1st order in NS equations).
so in a resume, if u dont know the absolute pressure in a point of ure domain, u cannot get the absolute pressure at ure outlet.
(if u choose a pressure outlet, Fluent will not consider anymore the operating condition. The operating pressure will be calculated from ure outlet).
If u didnt undertsand, write to me again
thecfduser is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Problem simulating bubble formation in microchannels iitian2005 FLUENT 0 June 3, 2009 04:03
How to model H2 flow through microchannels? Adarsh Main CFD Forum 3 December 15, 2005 12:47
MR Fluid Flow through microchannels Sinan FLUENT 0 September 18, 2004 01:03
Two-phase flow in microchannels Shubidu Main CFD Forum 0 January 5, 2004 06:24
secondary flow in microchannels uwe Main CFD Forum 1 August 26, 2001 12:35


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:29.