Does the wall BC set k & e to zero?

May 8, 2006, 05:30

Hi,all!

I use the ske model and set the BC as "WALL" for some solid boundarys. But after caculation I ploted turbulence kinetic energy(k) along these "walls" and found them not equal to 0. Why???

I tried adding some source terms to the momentum equations, but the caculations diverged soon. I checked the values of k and found them quite large somewhere on the wall. I think this resulted in the divergence.

Can anyone tell me how fluent set the "WALL" BC? If I change the boundary condition "wall" to "velocity inlet" and set velocity,k and e to 0, is there any problem?

Any help will be very appreciated!

May 8, 2006, 12:39

The default boundary condition for a wall is no-slip, so the immediately adjacent velocity is 0. Maybe if you set the walls to be slip walls (in the wall boundary condition panel) you would get nonzero k and e.

May 8, 2006, 21:53

The problem is that I want k and e on the wall to be equal to ZERO but FLUENT actually don't set them to zeros in the default WALL boundary condition.

Marta · December 10, 2010, 11:49

Hi guys!
I am trying to create a boundary condition in Fluent similar to the wall+source which can be found in CFX.
Do you know if it's possible for me to use any kind of udf to do this?

In particular what I would like to do is to add a mass flow rate source, instead of using the mass flow inlet boundary.
This is because i need to perform some other operations which are only allowed on walls.

Thanks a lot in advance!

Marta

May 8, 2006, 05:30	Does the wall BC set k & e to zero?	#1
Lucy Guest Posts: n/a	Hi,all! I use the ske model and set the BC as "WALL" for some solid boundarys. But after caculation I ploted turbulence kinetic energy(k) along these "walls" and found them not equal to 0. Why??? I tried adding some source terms to the momentum equations, but the caculations diverged soon. I checked the values of k and found them quite large somewhere on the wall. I think this resulted in the divergence. Can anyone tell me how fluent set the "WALL" BC? If I change the boundary condition "wall" to "velocity inlet" and set velocity,k and e to 0, is there any problem? Any help will be very appreciated!

May 8, 2006, 12:39	Re: Does the wall BC set k & e to zero?	#2
Evan Rosenbaum Guest Posts: n/a	The default boundary condition for a wall is no-slip, so the immediately adjacent velocity is 0. Maybe if you set the walls to be slip walls (in the wall boundary condition panel) you would get nonzero k and e.

May 8, 2006, 21:53	Re: Does the wall BC set k & e to zero?	#3
Lucy Guest Posts: n/a	The problem is that I want k and e on the wall to be equal to ZERO but FLUENT actually don't set them to zeros in the default WALL boundary condition.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Thin Wall Heat Transfer BC for rhoSimpleFoam	swahono	OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD	12	October 4, 2013 11:49
UDF for wall slipping	HFLUENT	Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming	0	April 27, 2011 12:03
how to set up wall function in bubbleFoam	adouchihiitoko	OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD	5	November 5, 2010 05:59
Parallel implementation of k-e model	Niels	Main CFD Forum	6	June 27, 2008 14:31
what the result is negatif pressure at inlet	chong chee nan	FLUENT	0	December 29, 2001 05:13

December 10, 2010, 11:49		#4
Marta Member Marta Lazzarin Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Italy Posts: 71 Rep Power: 16	Hi guys! I am trying to create a boundary condition in Fluent similar to the wall+source which can be found in CFX. Do you know if it's possible for me to use any kind of udf to do this? In particular what I would like to do is to add a mass flow rate source, instead of using the mass flow inlet boundary. This is because i need to perform some other operations which are only allowed on walls. Thanks a lot in advance! Marta