CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Highly Skewed Cells

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   July 20, 2010, 10:22
Smile Highly Skewed Cells
  #1
New Member
 
Chris Turner
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Belfast
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 8
chrisoturner is on a distinguished road
Hi!

I am running a simulation that has approximately 500,000 cells. It is a hybrid mesh of both hex and tet cells. The tet cells are being used as this is an optimisation problem where different geometries are being modelled and compared-the tet cells seemed to offer the most consistent cell size and count for different geometries compared to the hex options.

In my model, I have approximately 0.01% highly skewed cells (above 0.97). My model still converges and seems to give reasonable results so I was wondering if these skewed cells matter? There are approximately 40 cells that are highly skewed in the entire model and none of them are clumped together, it seems to be one cell here and one cell there.

Does anyone know of a way of getting rid of single highly skewed cells within fluent /Gambit?

Thanks!

Chris

chrisoturner is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 21, 2010, 01:03
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
-mAx-'s Avatar
 
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 2,972
Rep Power: 30
-mAx- will become famous soon enough
In Gambit, if you are sure that the highly skewed cells don't come from your geometry (small angle, small edge, etc...) then you can try modifying slightly the cell's size (or Size Function's parameters).
That's my workaround
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider
-mAx- is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 21, 2010, 04:38
Default
  #3
Member
 
kdrbrk's Avatar
 
Burak
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 90
Rep Power: 8
kdrbrk is on a distinguished road
can we just change the mesh size of skewed cells, or must we remesh the whole domain?
kdrbrk is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 21, 2010, 05:07
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
-mAx-'s Avatar
 
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 2,972
Rep Power: 30
-mAx- will become famous soon enough
you must remesh all the volume concerned.

As another workaround, if the highly skewed cells are direct connected to a surface, you can try to correct the skewness of the cell by moving the node (belonging to the cell) on the surface (--> Face/Mesh/Move Face Nodes)
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider
-mAx- is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 21, 2010, 09:56
Default
  #5
Member
 
kdrbrk's Avatar
 
Burak
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 90
Rep Power: 8
kdrbrk is on a distinguished road
my highly skewed cells are generally on(2D) or next to(3D) surface. So these recommendation will be very useful. Thanks Max
kdrbrk is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 21, 2010, 10:08
Default
  #6
New Member
 
Chris Turner
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Belfast
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 8
chrisoturner is on a distinguished road
Thanks for the info Max. In your experience, if there are very little skewed cells (0.01%) and the CFD matches experimental data, is there any need to try and eliminate the skewed cells?

I just think it may take a long time for not much improvement in result accuracy.

Chris
chrisoturner is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 22, 2010, 01:19
Default
  #7
Super Moderator
 
-mAx-'s Avatar
 
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 2,972
Rep Power: 30
-mAx- will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisoturner View Post
Thanks for the info Max. In your experience, if there are very little skewed cells (0.01%) and the CFD matches experimental data, is there any need to try and eliminate the skewed cells?

I just think it may take a long time for not much improvement in result accuracy.

Chris
In my experience, I can say that highly skewed elements can affect the convergence with drops in the residuals (but not always).
But the question is: Are skewed cells in a specific region where you need to catch something?
At the other hand you reached results in agreement with experimental data, so....
I already gave up trying to fix some highly skewed cells, especially after one day of attempts, and I didn't encounter any convergence issue.
Nevertheless I try to keep max skewness below 0.9 (for unstructured grids)
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider
-mAx- is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 22, 2010, 06:43
Default
  #8
New Member
 
Chris Turner
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Belfast
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 8
chrisoturner is on a distinguished road
Thanks for the advice MAX! Once again, you have been very helpful!

Chris
chrisoturner is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Import netgen mesh to OpenFOAM hsieh Open Source Meshers: Gmsh, Netgen, CGNS, ... 32 September 13, 2011 05:50
external flow with snappyHexMesh chelvistero OpenFOAM 11 January 15, 2010 20:43
Highly skewed and inverted volumes in wing mesh makaero FLUENT 0 December 8, 2009 20:32
what to do w/ highly skewed elements? (GAMBIT) mike FLUENT 5 June 2, 2007 22:10
physical boundary error!! kris CD-adapco 2 August 3, 2005 00:32


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:46.