CFD Online URL
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Continuum between volumes (default wall condition)

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   August 11, 2010, 23:58
Default Continuum between volumes (default wall condition)
  #1
Senior Member
 
Mohsin Mukhtar
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: South Korea
Posts: 249
Rep Power: 7
Mohsin is on a distinguished road
I have 2 cylinders. 1 cylinder is small and is at some distance inside of the bigger cylinder. The flow comes from the smaller cylnder and goes thorugh the bigger cylinder. But When I export the mesh a Default face wall boundary is created at the end face of the small cylinder. GAMBIT is not taking it as a continuum by default.

Can anybody please tell me how i can force continuum between them so that the face is not considered as wall by default. Thanks

Mohsin
Mohsin is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 12, 2010, 02:43
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
-mAx-'s Avatar
 
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 2,861
Rep Power: 29
-mAx- will become famous soon enough
post a picture and explain how you build your geometry.
Did you split /substract volumes?
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider
-mAx- is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 12, 2010, 03:51
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Mohsin Mukhtar
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: South Korea
Posts: 249
Rep Power: 7
Mohsin is on a distinguished road
Max Thank you for ur reply.

Attached is the geometry. I was talking about the upper 2 cylinders. The middle (smaller cylinder) is through in the bigger cylinder. when i export it to fluent it takes the lower end face of the middle cylinder as wall (Air is flowing through the lower end so I need Gambit to consider it as a continuum not a wall). How should i specify that
Attached Images
File Type: jpg cyclone.jpg (45.6 KB, 31 views)
Mohsin is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 12, 2010, 04:05
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
-mAx-'s Avatar
 
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 2,861
Rep Power: 29
-mAx- will become famous soon enough
try to move the small cylinder.
If you can move it, then your geometry isn't ok.
In this cas you will need to split the biggest cylinder with the smallest. (but the question is what are you supposed to modelise)
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider
-mAx- is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 12, 2010, 04:45
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Mohsin Mukhtar
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: South Korea
Posts: 249
Rep Power: 7
Mohsin is on a distinguished road
Max thanks for ur reply. The middle cylinder is moving.

Actually I m simulating cyclone. The same cyclone which in the following tutorial he is making us learn to simulate.

http://www.itc.polsl.pl/gwecel/Mns/Fluent_tutorial.pdf

on page 14, he says about connect disconnet faces in order to make the middle cylinder as a continuum.

"After operation two volumes are linked by one face forcing later the same mesh to be generated for both volumes at that face. Not connected faces will be by default treated as wall"


could u please explain that.
Mohsin is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 12, 2010, 05:04
Default
  #6
Super Moderator
 
-mAx-'s Avatar
 
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 2,861
Rep Power: 29
-mAx- will become famous soon enough
If the faces aren't connected, then you have 2 superposed meshes, treated as wall by Fluent.
In your case I would split the small cylinder with the big one (enable Retain option).
And in the BC you need to enforce gambit setting the cover surface as wall. With split, gambit set automatically all internal surfaces (as Internal)
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider
-mAx- is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 12, 2010, 05:20
Default
  #7
Senior Member
 
Mohsin Mukhtar
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: South Korea
Posts: 249
Rep Power: 7
Mohsin is on a distinguished road
Max I m sorry I didnt get your point.

I dont want the cover face as wall. If I split the middle cylinder wityh the bigger cylinder then 2 cylinder volumes are created but still Gambit treats the cover face as wall. Could you please elaborate
Mohsin is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 12, 2010, 05:58
Default
  #8
Super Moderator
 
-mAx-'s Avatar
 
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 2,861
Rep Power: 29
-mAx- will become famous soon enough
Faces resulting from Split are treated as Internal (not wall)
If you get walls, then splits aren't correct.
But if you don't want the cover as wall, and the top as wall, then go and unite the 2 cylinders
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider
-mAx- is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 12, 2010, 06:19
Default
  #9
Senior Member
 
Mohsin Mukhtar
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: South Korea
Posts: 249
Rep Power: 7
Mohsin is on a distinguished road
Thank you for your time

Max yes faces resulting from split operation are treated as internal.But the face (which i have marked in picture) cannot to be splitted. I united the 2 cylinders but the lower face (as shown in picture) is always treated as wall.

Could you tell me how can i split it (the lower face shown in figure) so that it is not treated as wall.

I have tried number of ways to split it but in vain.
Attached Images
File Type: png cyclone.png (10.1 KB, 11 views)
Mohsin is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 12, 2010, 06:47
Default
  #10
Super Moderator
 
-mAx-'s Avatar
 
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 2,861
Rep Power: 29
-mAx- will become famous soon enough
check if don't have superposed surface at this place.
If yes than connect them (surface/connect)
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider
-mAx- is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 12, 2010, 09:15
Default
  #11
Senior Member
 
Mohsin Mukhtar
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: South Korea
Posts: 249
Rep Power: 7
Mohsin is on a distinguished road
There is only 1 face at that place and no other face is superimposed.
Mohsin is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 13, 2010, 02:24
Default
  #12
Super Moderator
 
-mAx-'s Avatar
 
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 2,861
Rep Power: 29
-mAx- will become famous soon enough
Ok if you split volume 1 (biggest cylinder) with volume 4, you don't have problem.
I exported the mesh and I don't have any unwanted wall.
But if you need the cover surface (surface 11 ) inside the biggest volume, then you need to define it as wall in the BC
You will also have a problem with skewness because of small angle between edges 18 and 24.
You can sweep face 15 in x-direction with amplitude 0.01. And aplly a size function for refining the mesh along the suface 0.01x0.89
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider
-mAx- is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 13, 2010, 02:40
Default
  #13
Senior Member
 
Mohsin Mukhtar
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: South Korea
Posts: 249
Rep Power: 7
Mohsin is on a distinguished road
Thank you so much Max. I am really grateful.

Quote:
Originally Posted by -mAx- View Post
But if you need the cover surface (surface 11 ) inside the biggest volume, then you need to define it as wall in the BC
When i define wall inside and export in fluent. Fluent gives me an extra boundary condition "wall-shadow". What influence it may have on the result? and how to remove it?
Mohsin is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 13, 2010, 03:10
Default
  #14
Super Moderator
 
-mAx-'s Avatar
 
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 2,861
Rep Power: 29
-mAx- will become famous soon enough
Then something isn't correct.
But the issue with the top of small cylinder is ok, now?

I saw you set the BC before split operations.
I would alway set the BC once your mesh is ready. In your case, in the BC Panel select delete All, and redefine the BC.
If you still have the problem, send me the journal file describing all the steps till mesh export.
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider
-mAx- is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 13, 2010, 03:28
Default
  #15
Senior Member
 
Mohsin Mukhtar
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: South Korea
Posts: 249
Rep Power: 7
Mohsin is on a distinguished road
The upper cylinder problem is solved. Thankyou. as now its just a fluid zone not occupied with wall faces.

For Fluent problem which gives additional shadow wall term I got the following from CFD online discussions:

you will only get a shadow wall if the mesh on a common wall is the same. That is to say if their are two volume zones that are connected and separated by one wall then FLuent will split the wall into two, i.e wall and then its shadow. So the two volume zones each have their own identical wall.

Reference: Fluent not creating Shadow wall

It just seperates the 2 fluid zones. So i may not be worried about it?

I tried what you asked me to do. i-e first I created gerometry and did all split operations, then mesh (checked with just very coarse mesh with less interval count) and then applied boundary conditions. But stuill fluent creates a shadow wall.
Mohsin is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 13, 2010, 04:07
Default
  #16
Super Moderator
 
-mAx-'s Avatar
 
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 2,861
Rep Power: 29
-mAx- will become famous soon enough
Ok, then you can try to iterate.
Else you can try spliting the volume at the same z-level than your top surface. (copy and move outer edges from big cylinder, create surface from them and split big volume with this surface).
Then the fluid volume will be completly splitted, and you shouldn't get the wall shadows.
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider
-mAx- is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 13, 2010, 04:50
Default
  #17
Senior Member
 
Mohsin Mukhtar
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: South Korea
Posts: 249
Rep Power: 7
Mohsin is on a distinguished road
Great Max.

I created a circular face and moved it until the lower face of cover and split it with the bigger cylinder. After that i splitted the middle cylinder with the bigger one and got the desired result. I have attached the picture.

Max you told me that

"You will also have a problem with skewness because of small angle between edges 18 and 24. You can sweep face 15 in x-direction with amplitude 0.01. And aplly a size function for refining the mesh along the suface 0.01x0.89 "

I splitted the face in x direction but it will create 2 faces and the problem with the original face (having sharp angles ) will remain there.
Also which size function is preferable in this case "Mesh, curvature or fixed"

Thank you for ur assistance.

P.S. I am unable to increase your reputation more now
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Cyclone.jpg (40.9 KB, 8 views)
Mohsin is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 13, 2010, 05:12
Default
  #18
Super Moderator
 
-mAx-'s Avatar
 
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 2,861
Rep Power: 29
-mAx- will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mohsin View Post
I splitted the face in x direction but it will create 2 faces and the problem with the original face (having sharp angles ) will remain there.
Also which size function is preferable in this case "Mesh, curvature or fixed"
Merge the 2 surfaces on both sides from the edge giving you trouble --> the edge will disappear
Regarding size funtion you can use fixed with start size 0.01 for instance
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider
-mAx- is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 13, 2010, 05:30
Default
  #19
Senior Member
 
Mohsin Mukhtar
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: South Korea
Posts: 249
Rep Power: 7
Mohsin is on a distinguished road
Error:
tried to merge faces that are not connected.
Tried to merge faces with diferent upper topoplogy or with nion manifold neighbours(share the common boundary with another face)

Which face you are refereing to. The upper face or or side faces.
Mohsin is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 13, 2010, 05:58
Default
  #20
Super Moderator
 
-mAx-'s Avatar
 
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 2,861
Rep Power: 29
-mAx- will become famous soon enough
upper faces (z=constant)
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider
-mAx- is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Slip flow boundary condition on wall using UDFs mahdi haddad FLUENT 1 November 11, 2014 07:13
Wall boundary condition in cylindrical co-ordinate shekharc Main CFD Forum 3 December 2, 2009 09:20
Wall thickness boundary condition mskim FLUENT 0 February 14, 2009 17:37
Deformation of wall by temperature condition Jay FLUENT 0 April 14, 2007 19:06
Help required regarding wall boundary condition Rashad FLUENT 1 October 9, 2006 19:31


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:19.