CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

3D mixing using moving reference frame

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   August 13, 2010, 20:41
Question 3D mixing using moving reference frame
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 7
maplebird is on a distinguished road
Hi all

I'm a new user of fluent and i'd like to know how to simulate a mixing tank with a single rotor.
I defined fluid zone, rotor surface wall and mixer wall. Then i run it in Fluent. i wasn't sure how to set boundry conditions. What i did is that
Mixer wall: stationary wall
rotor surface wall: moving wall; absolute velocity and i put in a speed 1000 rpm
fluid: i put stationary.

I'd like to know did i do somthing wrong there? Thank you very much

MB
maplebird is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 14, 2010, 11:11
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
xrs333
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 125
Rep Power: 7
xrs333 is on a distinguished road
unfortunately, you did.
The motion type of the fluid zone should be set as moving reference frame with rotational velocity equals that of the rotor, and the rotation-axis origin & the rotation-axis direction be define properly. Then go to the boundary condition panel and set the mixer wall as stational wall, the rotor wall as moving wall with a rotational velocity of zero raletive to adjacent cell zone. -- this is the single rotational reference frame model.
But you didn't tell us if there are baffles in the mixer. the SRF model is not valid for this case.
Good luck.
xrs333 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 14, 2010, 11:23
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
xrs333
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 125
Rep Power: 7
xrs333 is on a distinguished road
the rule of a thumb is that no wall boundary should have a non-zero component of velocity in the reference frame for the adjacent cell zone unless a dynamic mesh is used.
xrs333 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 17, 2010, 13:30
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 7
maplebird is on a distinguished road
Thank you very much xrs333 for your reply.

My model doesn't have any baffle for the moment (only wall and a rotor). When I applied what you wrote, I found that I got contradictory results when axis speed is the highest. I think SRF is probably not good for my case. And my wall is not surface of revolution neither, therefore Multiple reference frame seems not valid. Moreover. I also wanted to set up an interface to make moving/stationary fluid zone, but its not so convinient for a 3D and I don't know how this interface will be constructed like (compared to 2D, in which a simple circle can be used). I will try again what u said anyway.
maplebird is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 17, 2010, 15:10
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 7
maplebird is on a distinguished road
I'm not conviced to set the fluid zone as rotating and then the rotor as moving to adjacent cell zone cause my result was that longer distance from the rotor, higher the speed is; which is contarary to the reality. COuld you explain to me?
maplebird is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 17, 2010, 16:10
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
xrs333
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 125
Rep Power: 7
xrs333 is on a distinguished road
if you use moving reference frame, you may use relative velocity for postprocess.
xrs333 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 18, 2010, 12:47
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 7
maplebird is on a distinguished road
Hello xrs333, thanks. actually later i tried to create interfaces in fluid zone and I divided the fluid zone into moving and stationary zone. Then i ran the MRF and it seems good. However i randomly divided the fluide zone using a face and I dont know if the choice of the face can give different result or not.
maplebird is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 18, 2010, 14:05
Default
  #8
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 7
Mansureh is on a distinguished road
Hi maplebird
can I ask in Which mesh generation software you made your geometry? If you made it in Gambit software , you can follow this procedure to have interface between fluid zones:
you should make both moving and stationary zones and splite the moving zone with stationary zone. In real, the stationary zone will divide to 2 domains, specify the faces between 2 zones as wall, after meshing the geometry and It's exporting to Fluent, you will see that wall and Its shadow in boundary condition dialog box. change It's type to interior; wall BC and it's shadow will disappear and fluid can move between 2 fluid zones.
Mansureh is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 1, 2010, 14:35
Default converging problem to mixingtank
  #9
New Member
 
anonymous
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 6
cfd_confuse is on a distinguished road
Hi xrs333, i have tried your method of setting the boundary conditions for my mixing tank but the solution did not converge. i am currently using a 0.5m by 0.5m tank. there is 400,000 cells for the moving zone and 80,000 cells for the rest of the fluid in the tank. The rest of the boundary condition is use as the default given in fluent5/6. But solution starts to diverge at around 7 x 10^-3.. any possible reason for this?
cfd_confuse is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
mrf, rotor

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Error with Wmake skabilan OpenFOAM Installation 3 July 28, 2009 00:35
OpenFOAM on MinGW crosscompiler hosted on Linux allenzhao OpenFOAM Installation 127 January 30, 2009 20:08
G95 + CGNS Bruno Main CFD Forum 1 January 30, 2007 01:34
Building OpenFoAm on SGI Altix 64bits anne OpenFOAM Installation 8 June 15, 2006 09:27
Moving reference frame and mixing plan sam FLUENT 0 October 3, 2004 13:32


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:36.