|
[Sponsors] |
August 28, 2010, 00:45 |
Validation of FLUENT
|
#1 |
New Member
Destry Marulitua Siagian
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 15 |
Dear all...
i just run some cases about fluid flow around cylindrical structure.. how can i know my result valid or not? how can i know this FLUENT valid? thank you so much... Gbu |
|
August 28, 2010, 05:25 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 260
Rep Power: 17 |
What type of flow? you may have analytical solution for certain types like laminar or inviscid
|
|
August 28, 2010, 05:36 |
|
#3 | |
New Member
Destry Marulitua Siagian
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 15 |
Quote:
i do analytical solution for inviscid flow... but from simulation the velocity around the pipe = 0.. but in analytical solution the velocity around pipe = 2*U U = inflow velocity.... i do the simulation based on FLUENT tutorial.... |
||
August 29, 2010, 02:18 |
|
#4 | |
New Member
Destry Marulitua Siagian
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 15 |
Quote:
i also do an analytical solution for 1 case from FLUENT tutorial,,, when i do comparing,,, the result also give a big difference... especially on the pipe surface.. but when i do comparing above the pipe,,, it gives close result.. is it the limitation of this program? thx all |
||
September 1, 2010, 04:21 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Svetlin Filipov
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 176
Rep Power: 17 |
Give more information.... and beware of the fact that close to obstacles the velocity lim-s to zero....
|
|
September 1, 2010, 04:46 |
|
#6 | |
New Member
Destry Marulitua Siagian
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 15 |
Quote:
pipe position in middle of frame... i also have problem in pressure also gives a big error (when i comparing to analytical solution) the analytic solution using superposition of uniform flow+doublet equation... here i attach velocity contour produce by fluent for my case |
||
September 1, 2010, 05:06 |
|
#7 |
Senior Member
Svetlin Filipov
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 176
Rep Power: 17 |
I do not see velocity problems.... check Re and see the flow pattern.... How did you calculate that velocity must be 2*U?!?!? and where it must be so (around where)?
|
|
September 1, 2010, 05:27 |
|
#8 | |
New Member
Destry Marulitua Siagian
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 15 |
Quote:
where tetha is the angle to the center of pipe.... i calculate them from the superposition of uniform flow+doublet flow... here i attach the picture again with the angle |
||
September 1, 2010, 05:41 |
|
#9 |
Senior Member
Svetlin Filipov
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 176
Rep Power: 17 |
On the picture you have resultant velocity ( velocity magnitude) and the formula you are looking for "x"... try to show only velocity on x-axis...
|
|
September 1, 2010, 05:47 |
|
#10 | |
New Member
Destry Marulitua Siagian
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 15 |
Quote:
i also attach the equation here.... thx before |
||
September 1, 2010, 06:12 |
|
#11 |
Senior Member
Svetlin Filipov
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 176
Rep Power: 17 |
I am not sure if you can use these equations for all Re range....
|
|
September 1, 2010, 06:18 |
|
#12 |
New Member
Destry Marulitua Siagian
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 15 |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Two questions on Fluent UDF | Steven | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 7 | March 23, 2018 03:22 |
How to open Icem mesh in Ansys Fluent? | emmkell | FLUENT | 27 | February 6, 2018 03:34 |
Fluent 6.3 32bit vs Fluent 12.0 64bit | ibex7 | FLUENT | 7 | April 18, 2011 02:44 |
Fluent validation | Yakov Afanasyev | FLUENT | 0 | July 26, 2006 15:13 |
Advanced Turbulence Modeling in Fluent, Realizable k-epsilon Model | Jonas Larsson | FLUENT | 5 | March 13, 2000 03:27 |