CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Courant number

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree4Likes
  • 1 Post By pranab_jha
  • 1 Post By fireman
  • 2 Post By Laci

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   October 4, 2010, 07:02
Default Courant number
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 9
fireman is on a distinguished road
Hi, everyone,

I would like to know what the Courant number is used for? I can understand that CFL number is used to control the time step in couple explicit solver with explicit unsteady formulation. But in couple implicit or explicit solver with implicit unsteady formulation, the time step will be manually specified in the iterate panel, It may imply that the courant number can not control the time step anymore, so why should I need a courant number in these case? Thank you!
fireman is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 4, 2010, 08:55
Wink
  #2
Member
 
anonym
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 65
Rep Power: 9
Laci is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by fireman View Post
Hi, everyone,

I would like to know what the Courant number is used for? I can understand that CFL number is used to control the time step in couple explicit solver with explicit unsteady formulation. But in couple implicit or explicit solver with implicit unsteady formulation, the time step will be manually specified in the iterate panel, It may imply that the courant number can not control the time step anymore, so why should I need a courant number in these case? Thank you!
Because you "cannot predict the future".
The Courant number helps to find the appropriate time step for a given mesh You will find the equation how to calculate the time step according to your elements size.
Laci is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 4, 2010, 09:12
Default
  #3
Member
 
pranab_jha's Avatar
 
Pranab N Jha
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 86
Rep Power: 8
pranab_jha is on a distinguished road
Exactly as Laci said. Here is some information: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Courant...Lewy_condition

In Fluent, if while running a transient simulation, the Courant # goes above 250 (default, you can change that too), your computation stops there and then. It means your solution is diverging. The flow speed is too fast to be calculated at that time step size or at that grid size.
jyothsna k likes this.
pranab_jha is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 4, 2010, 12:49
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 9
fireman is on a distinguished road
Thank you very much, Laci and pranab_jha. Since the Courant number helps to find the appropriate time step, why do i need to specify a time step in the iterate panel for simulation? and what's the relationship between the time step found by Courant number and the time step manually specified in the iterate panel?
DungPham likes this.
fireman is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 4, 2010, 12:54
Default
  #5
Member
 
anonym
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 65
Rep Power: 9
Laci is on a distinguished road
As I remember, you can set the time step manually (when you have to take care about the Courant number) or there is an automatic option. With this option Fluent will find the "appropriate" time step for your problem, with variable time steps. Be careful if you choose this second option, sometimes it makes errors which lead to high Courant number.
This feature (automatic) gives quite good guess, how much should be the first time point.
Laci is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 28, 2016, 12:55
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
Thomas MADELEINE
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 126
Rep Power: 3
Thomas MADELEINE is on a distinguished road
Hi all,

first sorry for resurrecting this topic, I don't know if i should open a new one or not...

I have some issues with my simulation on FLUENT on my question is quite simple :

can we have a too low courant number ? or a timestep too small ?


I explain myself :

I run a transient simulation of a tank where I print the forces on the walls (created by the fluid).
After a few step (10), I stop my simulation and want to know some instant reactions of the flow (the aim is that the solution will not change here between two timestep).

for that i reduce drasticaly my time step, and pursue the simulation for two timestep (and compare the two data files).

I have tried with four kind of time-step, and all the case has converged (residuals below 1e-7, quite a simple case though)

But when I compare the wall-forces, the smaller timestep cases have gone totally wrong...

Has somebody already seen this kind of problem ?

Sorry for my bad english, I hope I have made myself clear.

Thanks

Thomas
Thomas MADELEINE is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mesh Refinement Luiz Eduardo Bittencourt Sampaio (Sampaio) OpenFOAM Mesh Utilities 41 January 17, 2013 03:43
DecomposePar unequal number of shared faces maka OpenFOAM Pre-Processing 6 August 12, 2010 09:01
Unaligned accesses on IA64 andre OpenFOAM 5 June 23, 2008 10:37
Could anybody help me see this error and give help liugx212 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 3 January 4, 2006 19:07
Trimmed cell and embedded refinement mesh conversion issues michele OpenFOAM Other Meshers: ICEM, Star, Ansys, Pointwise, GridPro, Ansa, ... 2 July 15, 2005 04:15


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:02.