CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

2nd order and Turbulent-viscosity ratio error

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   October 4, 2010, 12:33
Default 2nd order and Turbulent-viscosity ratio error
  #1
New Member
 
jean
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 8
freekeer is on a distinguished road
Hi,

I am working on a combustor, and for the moment I simply try to model the airflow inside of it.
I designed 1/6th of it to use its periodicity.
I have generated several grids with various geometries of the devices, and for some reason, I always get a "Turbulent viscosity ratio has been limited" error on some of them when I switch from a 1st order converged solution, to a 2nd order (Presto for the Pressure, 2nd order for the other variables).

The problem always comes from the inlet of my device (I have specified a mass-flow inlet).
Here is a picture of the turbulent viscosity ratio of the inlet, for a converged 1st order :



and after a few iterations with the 2nd order :



I don't know how to get rid of these viscosity bubbles.
I tried to set some yplus modification, but I am not sure I am doing it correctly, and it doesn't have any effect.

Here is the detail of my simulation :
Green-gauss cell based implicit steady solver
k-e standard model for the viscosity, with non-equilibrium wall function.
I set the air as an ideal gas.
The BOCO of the outlet is a negative pressure-outlet.

What should I do to have a correct viscosity near my wall ? (I tried to adapt the model with a normal distance from the boundary, to refine the grid near the wall, but the error keeps appearing a few iterations after).

Thanks!
freekeer is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 5, 2010, 04:08
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 9
Piotrek is on a distinguished road
Dear jean,

I suggest you keep on iterating. The problem should dissipate. I expect your "bubbles" are caused by a sudden temperature change due to combustion. You can check if in the locations of high viscosity you have combustion taking place.
Piotrek is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 5, 2010, 04:40
Default
  #3
New Member
 
jean
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 8
freekeer is on a distinguished road
Thanks for your fast reply.
The problem is that at the moment, I am only modelling the airflow, with no fuel added and no combustion.
I tried to keep on iterating, but these area usually spread and make the simulation crash :/
freekeer is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 5, 2010, 05:41
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 9
Piotrek is on a distinguished road
in that case go to
solution - monitor - limits
(the path might not be exact)
and change the viscosity limit.
Piotrek is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
fluent, viscosity ratio, yplus

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RSM+2nd ordedr causes turbulent viscosity limited to viscosity ratio of.... khsiavash Main CFD Forum 10 January 7, 2016 13:30
"turbulent viscosity limited to viscosity ratio" olivier FLUENT 11 October 10, 2015 05:49
turbulent viscosity ratio for jet serpil FLUENT 3 September 19, 2014 06:19
On limiting to turbulent viscosity ratio! varghese FLUENT 2 November 15, 2003 09:56


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:31.