|December 29, 2010, 09:04||
Non-nominal conditions in a radial turbine
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 3Rep Power: 7
I'm simulating a radial turbine.
For nominal conditions (no angle of incidence) the calculations perform well.
When i switch to non-nominal conditions (with a bit of incidence), the results are unrealistic (the efficiency is higher than for the ideal case). I also have to decrease the under-relaxation factors to obtain convergence.
Should I use a unsteady simulation to predict vortex shedding?
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Direction of Rotation of Radial Turbine||ghoshi1983||CFX||8||June 19, 2012 10:16|
|Radial and Tangential Velocity boundary conditions||N. A.||OpenFOAM||4||September 2, 2011 07:21|
|Axial Thrust in a Radial Turbine||Amit Roghs||CFX||3||May 31, 2010 16:47|
|radial turbine flow analysis.||ME||Main CFD Forum||0||July 1, 2007 09:39|
|Simulation of Pelton Turbine: boundary conditions?||massimo||CFX||0||September 26, 2006 03:56|