CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Divergence in AMG-solver (enthalpy and p1)

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   December 21, 2010, 04:00
Default Divergence in AMG-solver (enthalpy and p1)
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 15
bastian26 is on a distinguished road
Hi everyone!
I simulate a steady turbulence flow combustion flow with the non-premixed combustion.
state relatation is equilibrium and its non-adiabatic
energy-model on
turbulence model ist k-omega (SST).

the simulation works fine and had a good convergence.
the i activated the P1-Radiation model.

for the mixture i set absorptions coefficient = wsggm-domain based.
scattering coefficient = 0
refractive = 1

the thermal wall boundary conditions i set to:
mixed: with free stream temp = 100°C
external and internal emmisivity = 1
and transfer coefficient = 5 w/m2 K

the feed inlet has a temp of ca 1000°C and the oxidator of 800°C

as i said the simulation converged good but with activated the p1-radiation
the comes the message after aproxx 25 iteration steps
divergence detected in amg-solver: p1
divergence detected in amg-solver: enthalpy

thank you for help!
bastian26 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 13, 2011, 13:14
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 15
pichai is on a distinguished road
Hi

Can you solve your problem ?
I got the same problem like you.
Please share me if you solved

Thanks
pichai is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 14, 2011, 03:09
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 15
bastian26 is on a distinguished road
hi
yes got the problem solved.
set the absorptions coefficient to wsggm-cell based, but i think this was only minor change.

But i decreased the under-relaxation factors. especially for p1.

now i calculate with these factors:

pressure: 0,3
density: 0,8
momentum: 0,4
turbulent kinetic energy: 0,7
turbulent dissipiation rate: 0,7
energy: 1,0
P1: 0,5

the first factors are so low, because i have i high swirled turbulence flow with a mixture.
i think it is important that you set the factor for p1 at beginning so low. So the enthalpy produced from p1 can build up slowly.

when the residuals got stabil, you could enhance the factors.

Hope i could help you! Good Luck
bastian26 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:22.