CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Turbulence Model and limitation to Reynolds number

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   January 24, 2011, 11:48
Default Turbulence Model and limitation to Reynolds number
  #1
New Member
 
Waseem
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 8
qascapri is on a distinguished road
Hello,
I am modeling heat transfer in a two-pass trapezoidal channe using Fluent. The Reynolds number at the inlet is 9400. I used low-Re k-epsilon model, RNG k-epsilon model, realisable k-epsilon model, standard k-omega model and SST k-omega model of Fluent to model turbulence. The comparison of numerical results with experiemnts shows that low-Re k-epsilon model is most accurate. The litrature on the other hand shows that SST k-omega model is the best. What can be the reason that I am not coming to the same conclusion as researchs have shown in the literature.
Is there any limitation with respect to the Reynolds number in the choice of a particular turbulence model?
qascapri is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Superlinear speedup in OpenFOAM 13 msrinath80 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 18 March 3, 2015 06:36
Limitation in Discrete Particle Model Woo Meng Wai FLUENT 0 September 12, 2007 06:22
Limitation of 2D and 3D model element number Soon CFX 3 January 30, 2006 16:15
Any mesh limitation for SSG Reynolds Stress Model? Sam Main CFD Forum 1 October 13, 2005 12:34
Advanced Turbulence Modeling in Fluent, Realizable k-epsilon Model Jonas Larsson FLUENT 5 March 13, 2000 04:27


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:24.