CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Changing Boundary: Decreasing Inlet Velocity - Convergence Issues

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   February 10, 2011, 12:09
Default Changing Boundary: Decreasing Inlet Velocity - Convergence Issues
  #1
New Member
 
Michael
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 23
Rep Power: 6
VT_Bromley is on a distinguished road
Hey all,

My system is a multiphase flow problem with sand and air. The air is injected through a nozzle initially with a set velocity of 345 m/s. After 0.1 seconds I would like to stop the inlet velocity or decrease it to approximately 0 m/s and let the sand settle. I ran the simulation to 0.1 seconds then manually changed the inlet velocity and began the calculation again.

Currently I have tried adaptive meshing, variable time stepping, and slowly manually stepping down the inlet velocity with no luck. I cannot get the problem to consistently converge. Does anyone have any recommendations?

Thanks,
Mike
VT_Bromley is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 11, 2011, 02:32
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 100
Rep Power: 8
alastormoody11 is on a distinguished road
Hi,

try reducing the under-relaxation factors of the problematic equations.

Also since you are modeling sand in air I am assuming that the you are using the Lagrangian- Eulerian model which requires high grid resolution depending on the particle size so maybe instead of adaptive meshing look at the unconvergerd solution for places where the concentration of sand is high and try with a finer mesh in those places from the start.

The grid required for an accurate solution would have a pretty high cell count if the sand is dispersing in a large portion of your control volume.
alastormoody11 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 11, 2011, 04:08
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Amir's Avatar
 
Amir
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Shiraz, Iran
Posts: 739
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 14
Amir is on a distinguished road
Hi Mike,
for solving such Lagrangian-Eulerian problems you can implement EDEM plugin in FLUENT.
I've never used that before but you can see it's propaganda.
http://www.dem-solutions.com/
Amir is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 12, 2011, 10:02
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Real Name :)
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: United States
Posts: 180
Rep Power: 7
ComputerGuy is on a distinguished road
Mike,
What size sand are you simulating? What time steps are you trying to use?

Unlike alastormoody, I think you can simulate this with a two-phase (or N-phase) Eulerian-Eulerian model. I don't believe there's a need to resolve individual grains of sand. At any rate, here are my suggestions:

1) Ensure that your grid is adequate in places it needs it
2) Ensure that when you begin your velocity ramp (or step change) that you were working with a converged solution in the first place. Obtaining convergence with a step-changed boundary condition off of a non-converged solution is just asking for trouble.
3) Is the physics really a step change? Meaning, does the velocity go from something to nothing instantaneously? In my experience, having a ramp, albeit a fast one, can improve the convergence of the solution. It takes longer to solve, but an unconverged solution is worthless.
4) If you need a UDF that will ramp down the velocity, let me know.
5) Take small time steps during the ramp, and much smaller time steps after you have zero velocity. Remember, fluent is trying to solve flow. It isn't a "no flow" solver. You'll struggle to get a converged solution if you don't take tiny time steps until all of your sand settles
6) If your sand size is too small (sub-micron), it's going to be tough to converge and see everything settle, as minor turbulence will keep grains aloft.

Have a look at the residuals and let us know what's misbehaving. In my experience, when simulating granular flow, epsilon (from a k-e turbulence model) tends to wander.

Regards,
ComputerGuy
ComputerGuy is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ATTENTION! Reliability problems in CFX 5.7 Joseph CFX 14 April 20, 2010 15:45
increasing mesh quality is leading to poor convergence tippo CFX 2 May 5, 2009 10:55
maintaining a logarithmic velocity distribution Morten Andersen CFX 1 January 8, 2007 12:37
Velocity Inlet Boundary Conditions katy FLUENT 2 January 5, 2006 16:35
Convective Heat Transfer - Heat Exchanger Mark CFX 6 November 15, 2004 16:55


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:27.