CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

pressure-based solver VS density-based solver

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   March 3, 2011, 15:42
Default pressure-based solver VS density-based solver
  #1
New Member
 
baudolina85@hotmail.it
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
giulypa_1985 is on a distinguished road
what is the difference between the "pressure-based solver" and the "density-based solver"?
giulypa_1985 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 3, 2011, 21:40
Post Re: Pressure-Based Solver (PBS) vs Density Based Solver (DBS)
  #2
Member
 
Engr Adeniyi
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 32
Rep Power: 8
Galileo is on a distinguished road
I am not sure you are a biginner in Fluent (like me), but I think it might help to ask which Solver is better for your problem and why?

Going through the Fluent Manual, there are a lot of differences and depending on what you are solving. Unless your question is enumerating the differences, I think you may want to ask that question based on your problem type, for example Density Based solver is not available for Eulerian multiphase model framework, you will use the pressure based solver. You can do stuffs like solidification and melting model only with PBS.

The PBS is said to employ a projection method algorithm, in this algorithm, mass conservation of the velocity field is obtained by solving a pressure/pressure correction equation in a way to satisty the continuity iteratively till convergence.

The DBS attempts to solve the Continuity, Momentum, Energy and Transport eqns. in a coupled manner i.e. simulataneously. then followed by additional scalar transport equation.

Some solution schemes may be available in PBS and not in DBS e.g. Central Diff. Scheme (CDS)., Bounded CDS.

For your PBS, you can use (generally): the following pressure-velocity coupling algorithms:
SIMPLE,SIMPLEC, PISO, Coupled and Fractional Step.

Note also that PBS allows both Coupled and Segregated options.

Hope this helps and not confusing
Galileo is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 4, 2011, 15:07
Default my work
  #3
New Member
 
baudolina85@hotmail.it
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
giulypa_1985 is on a distinguished road
i'm using fluent for modeling the dispersion of methane in air. the methane is introduced in air at 111K. I don't konw if is better use the density-based or the pressure-based models in the calculus.
giulypa_1985 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 7, 2011, 11:32
Post RE: Your Work (PRESSURE BASED SOLVER vs DENSITY BASED SOLVER)
  #4
Member
 
Engr Adeniyi
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 32
Rep Power: 8
Galileo is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by giulypa_1985 View Post
i'm using fluent for modeling the dispersion of methane in air. the methane is introduced in air at 111K. I don't konw if is better use the density-based or the pressure-based models in the calculus.
Sourced from:FIT Material

The following features are available with the density-based solver, but not with the pressure-based solver:
These are the "only" features available with the Density Based Solver:
1. **Real Gas Models (UDF and NIST)
2. Non-Reflecting BC
3. Wet-Steam Multiphase Model

Otherwise (as in your case), you may want to use Pressure Based Solver.

PBS is available for:
Cavitation Model
Volume-of-Fluid (VOF) Model
***Multiphase Mixture Model***
Eulerian multiphase model
Non-Premixed Combustion Model
Premixed Combustion Model
Partially Premixed Combustion Model
Composition PDF transport Model
Soot Model
Rosseland Radiation Model
Melting/Solidification Model
Shell Conduction Model
Floating Operating Pressure
Fixed Variable Option
Physical Velocity Formulation for Porous Media
Specified Mass flow rate for Stream-Wise Periodic flow

The coloured/asterisked options above look to me like what you are trying to do.
You may do a trial run on DBS to compare anyway.
Galileo is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 20, 2014, 08:00
Default supersonic multiphase flow
  #5
New Member
 
mohsen tavakol
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
mohsen tavakol is on a distinguished road
hello
i want to simulate a supersonic multi phase flow in fluent.
the phase are air and steam as ideal gas.
as i know, for simulating supersonic flows, we should use density based solver. but multi phase is disable in density based solver.
please guid me.
thanks.
mohsen tavakol is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 21, 2014, 04:01
Default
  #6
New Member
 
uday
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 5
uday sarkar is on a distinguished road
Hello
simulating supersonic flow and combustion together seems not possible with density based solver so is it ok to go ahead with pressure based solver?
Can anyone help?
Thanks
uday sarkar is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pressure based and Density based Solver Xobile Main CFD Forum 22 June 24, 2016 07:24
Using Density Gradient C_R_G(c,t), Pressure Based Solver Anirudh_Deodhar Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming 1 October 25, 2013 05:43
NRBC and pressure based solver ageorg FLUENT 1 August 28, 2009 07:11
why the solver reject it? Anyone with experience? bearcat CFX 6 April 28, 2008 14:08
Pressure vs Density based CFD solvers Danie Main CFD Forum 0 October 5, 2004 09:48


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:58.