CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

How small is "small" for the under-relaxation factor?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   March 5, 2011, 22:02
Default How small is "small" for the under-relaxation factor?
  #1
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 38
Rep Power: 5
aleisia is on a distinguished road
I choose SIMPLEC as solver, and second-order upwind for all properties except STANDARD for pressure. I choose 1 for pressure under-relation factor (from what I found about SIMPLEC), and all other factors are in default, say 0.7 for momentum, except that I set 0.0001 for my contaminant species.

In my problem, the experimental concentration data is on the order of 200mg/m3, and the species initial guess starts at 0, SI unit is used.

My question is: can I set, say 10^(-10) for my contaminant species as the under-relaxation factor? Of'coz I will start with 1 in the beginning ,and monitor the continuity to make sure it goes down to a lower level and keeps steady there, then decrease the factor, and wait till it decreases to another lower level and doesn't change much there, the do it over and over... Same thing for the momentum under-relaxation factor. Is there any lower limit of this factor? Am I doing it right? I'm worried about this.

Thanks!
aleisia is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 7, 2011, 00:45
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 100
Rep Power: 7
alastormoody11 is on a distinguished road
Hi,

first of all, if you are using such low values for under-relaxation factor first of all the equation for which you are assignig that factor will stagnate.

Secondly you cannot use the said strategy with the momentum equations because assuming you are using SIMPLEC they are coupled to your continuity equations and hence if you give a very low under-relaxation factor for your momentum equation, your continuity residuals are bound to stagnate.

I think you can go as low as 10^-14, but I dont see the point of going so low since after you reduce under-relaxation factor to 10^-10 there would be virtually no change in the residuals of the equation to which you have assigned it, so why go lower?

Also using 1 for pressure under-relaxation may make the solution unstable.
alastormoody11 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Under relaxation factor for external coupling dhxlxz CFX 9 September 13, 2012 11:42
under relaxation factor and the steady state jing113cn FLUENT 0 November 2, 2009 12:13
Relaxation factor Benzaa Main CFD Forum 1 August 18, 2009 07:27
Question on adjusting relaxation factor CFD Rookie Main CFD Forum 3 January 26, 2004 14:37
Relaxation factor Moon CD-adapco 1 June 13, 2003 11:13


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:30.