CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

High Rayleigh Number natural convection

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   April 25, 2011, 07:22
Default High Rayleigh Number natural convection
  #1
New Member
 
C.Y.HESIEH
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 6
fly829 is on a distinguished road
Hi.
I have some problem to compute high Rayleigh-number(e^10) natural convection,but the solution does not converge.

Problem geometry is a wind turbine nacelle(closed region), one of wall consider constant heat flux, the other wall consider constant temperature, no inlet and outlet.

the setup i use is

steady
consider gravity
model: energy and k-epsilon
density consider incompressible ideal gas
Presto!

but the continuity and energy are not converged

how do i setup the high Rayleigh-number natural convection?
can someone give me some comment?

Thank~
fly829 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 3, 2011, 18:53
Default
  #2
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 6
skullCFD is on a distinguished road
Natural convection problems are difficult to converge. Lowering the relaxation factors might help. I find SIMPLE to be better. The body force can be high for high Ra which might also cause convergence problems. A transient simulation with very small time steps might help in the beginning. You can use that solution and run a steady state simulation later. I am not sure if all nacelles have the BCs that you have but one important thing to check for natural convection problems is to see if there exists convection in the first place (i.e., which wall in your case is the hottest one, top, bottom, left or right?). If not, you might face convergence problems.
skullCFD is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 4, 2011, 06:41
Default
  #3
New Member
 
C.Y.HESIEH
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 6
fly829 is on a distinguished road
Thanks for replying~

i already decrease momentum relaxation factor to 0.1

however the continuity didn't convergence

the B.c i set is

Wall 1: constant heat flux
Other wall: constant temperature(assumption)

i will try your suggestion, transient first, and steady later.

Thanks
Regards
fly829 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 7, 2011, 10:41
Default
  #4
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 6
skullCFD is on a distinguished road
Transient simulation with very small time-steps helps a lot of times. Also, increasing the value for pressure under-relaxation to 0.6 or 0.7 with momentum less than 0.4 (you already have 0.1) will help bring the continuity residual down (may not work all the time but worth giving a try).
skullCFD is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Natural Convection Problem - Helium marzoa STAR-CCM+ 0 April 18, 2011 14:12
snappyHexMesh won't work - zeros everywhere! sc298 OpenFOAM Native Meshers: snappyHexMesh and Others 2 March 27, 2011 21:11
Natural Convection Boundary Conditions, tips or advise needed ! Logan Page ANSYS 0 September 27, 2010 18:44
Instability at the onset of natural convection Magherbi Main CFD Forum 0 October 23, 2002 09:53
Rayleigh Number Thomas P. Abraham Main CFD Forum 4 March 27, 1999 07:39


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:49.