# Help with electrical conductivity in Fuel cells

 User Name Remember Me Password
 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
 June 17, 2011, 06:11 Help with electrical conductivity in Fuel cells #1 New Member   Golnaz Join Date: May 2011 Posts: 2 Rep Power: 0 Hi everyone, i am tring to model a PEM fuel cell using fluent i have gone through the related tutorial and the fuel cell manual. I have a nonisotropic electrical conductivity. we also i have specofic values for in plane and through plane electrical conductivity in unit on S/m. what i understood, from the tutrial and the manual i would need to used UDS to be able to input the two values for electrical conductivity. but, my problem is that when i try using UDS diffusivity with the orthogonal option the values that i can put in are in kg/ms!!! but the values that i have are in S/m(unit of electrical conductivity) !!! I really dont understand how can i do that, it seems like am missing something, or misunderstanding some part. whats more, i dont understand how the UDS diffusivity can be defined as the electrical conductiviy.. Any Input is much appreciated.. Many Thanks

 June 17, 2011, 11:46 #2 Senior Member   MASOUD Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 102 Rep Power: 8 Golnaz, UDS is a general concept which can be employed to solve various problems. Fluent can not understand what variable we intend to model through UDS. That's why you find the unit of diffusivity as m/s. You just enter your value in S/m and go ahead with that. Hope this helps.

 June 17, 2011, 15:41 #3 New Member   Golnaz Join Date: May 2011 Posts: 2 Rep Power: 0 thank you Masoud for your reply... i will try that.. but how dose fluent realise that this input value in the uds diffussivity is the electrical conductivity...?! especially that its showing the unit as kg/s.. many thanks

 June 17, 2011, 16:21 #4 Senior Member   MASOUD Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 102 Rep Power: 8 Well, Fluent doesn't have to recognize what that is. The UDS equation you probably are going to define is : D[-(Electrical Conductivity) x D(Potential)]=(0 or Volumetric Current Density) These terms just have to be consistent. If you define the first term in S/m and specify the electronic potential boundary condition in Volt and the source term in A/m3 you will be all set. Golnaz and A CFD free user like this.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post vishwa OpenFOAM Native Meshers: snappyHexMesh and Others 23 August 6, 2014 03:50 hsieh Open Source Meshers: Gmsh, Netgen, CGNS, ... 32 September 13, 2011 05:50 sc298 OpenFOAM Native Meshers: snappyHexMesh and Others 2 March 27, 2011 21:11 Tobi OpenFOAM Native Meshers: snappyHexMesh and Others 0 November 10, 2010 04:23 kris CD-adapco 2 August 3, 2005 00:32

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:38.

 Contact Us - CFD Online - Top