CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Transition SST - Intermittency/Tu Decay/Y+

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   July 28, 2011, 08:29
Default Transition SST - Intermittency/Tu Decay/Y+
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 5
Kloz is on a distinguished road
Hi, I'm using the Transition SST model in Fluent V13 to model a transitional flow on a flat plate in a wind tunnel. I'm unsure about how to set the intermittency on the velocity inlet. Zero? 1? Any ideas there?
Regarding turbulence intensity, the manual mentions estimating the Tu decay. I have very little decay between my inlet and plate, but it exists nonetheless. How do I go about estimating that decay? Or is just trial and error until I reach the desired turbulence intensity values at the plate?
The manual also states that for the transition models y+<1 is desired. Seems pretty steep a requirement, I'm wondering if the 1-4 range might be sufficient. More importantly, do I also need to have the y+ on the tunnel walls less than 5?
Finally, sorry for the basic question, but what's the best way to identify the laminar and turbulent regions on the plate and the point of transition onset?

Thanks.
Kloz is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 31, 2011, 12:16
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 5
Kloz is on a distinguished road
Any advice regarding how to set the intermittency on the velocity inlet? It's the biggest question mark at the moment.
Kloz is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 31, 2011, 22:20
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
sail's Avatar
 
Vieri Abolaffio
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Always on the move.
Posts: 308
Rep Power: 7
sail is on a distinguished road
hi,

i reccomand some investigation on the papers of menter and the phd thesis of Langtry. the gamma-retheta model is not as easy as it looks and requires some tuning to get meaningful answers.

y+<1 is a must, anything bigger will move the transition point upstream. it is well documented in the fluent theory manual.
sail is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 29, 2011, 11:04
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 5
Kloz is on a distinguished road
So I've taken a look at Menter and Langtry's paper, 'A Correlation-Based Transition Model Using Local Variables'. I'm trying to replicate their results for one of the test cases they used to validate the model, the Schubauer flat plate experiment from the NACA TN 3489. I'm using the same inlet conditions they specify in the paper as well as the second order upwind scheme but for some reason transition just isn't being triggered. My Cf plot is exactly that of the laminar computation and consistent with the Blasius solution. Not really sure what I'm missing. Do I need to play around with wall roughness or wall material specifications for example? I've also tried upping the freestream turbulence intensity (to 0.5%, 1% & 3% compared to Menter's 0.18%) and playing with the viscosity ratio (10 & 120 compared to Menter's 5) but no luck, still laminar flow. Y+ is <1 all over the plate.
Kloz is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SST Transition model in Fluent 12.0 aqib FLUENT 4 November 8, 2010 08:14
SST Transition model in Fluent 12.0 Far FLUENT 1 November 8, 2010 02:32
Missing Information in SST Transition Model Formulation Josh CFX 2 September 14, 2010 11:49
to LANGTRY ROBIN :help, hypersonic transition SST ben akih CFX 0 September 21, 2006 04:59
flat plate transition: SST k-omega divergence Peter Gasparovic FLUENT 4 May 3, 2005 13:54


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:30.