# Net mass flow inlet vs outlet

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 August 12, 2011, 08:59 Net mass flow inlet vs outlet #1 New Member   Nicolas Guillemette Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 2 Rep Power: 0 Hi, I simulated an open channel flow problem for a dam project using two inlets (upstream boundary conditions) and one outlet (downstream boundary condition). The total water mass flow from my 2 inlets is 330 m3/s, thus I expected to get approximately the same mass flow for my outlet which is totally logical (conservation of mass). My simulation converged very well but I found out a mass flow of 570 m3/s at my outlet which is 240 m3/s more than the mass flow that enter in the domain ??? How does the model can enter 230 m3/s more water in my domain ?? I double checked the mass flow rate of my outlet in FLUENT and in the POST and I found for both a same difference mass flow of 230 m3/s ? I use the following parameter as model setup - VOF with the open channel flow option checked - Explicit solver - mass flow rate as upstream boundary conditions (inlets) - Specify water level as downstream boundary condition (outlet) - Geo-reconstruct as Volume fraction solution method....default options for the other solution methods - Outlet ventilation on the top of my domain Is somebody as an idea why the conservation of mass is wrong for a simple simulation like this one....I really do not understand why ? Thanks for your help ! Nicolas

 August 12, 2011, 10:09 #2 New Member   Nicolas Guillemette Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 2 Rep Power: 0 I think the best assumption to explain this mass flow difference is likely the fact that I patched with water in the initialization and this water volume (sort o wave from upstream to downstream) is now exiting the domain and give me a higher water mass flow than mass flow that enter inthe domain. I will continue to simulate and I suppose the mass flow will decrease at the outlet while all the initialization water volume will be out of the domain. Im still in the transient stage.....more time step to reach a sort of steady flow. I answer myself but somebody can confirmed my assumptions Thanks Nicolas

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Joseph CFX 14 April 20, 2010 15:45 richard FLUENT 2 June 1, 2008 11:44 vivian FLUENT 5 April 21, 2006 06:23 Abhi Main CFD Forum 12 July 8, 2002 09:11 chong chee nan FLUENT 0 December 29, 2001 06:13

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:39.