CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Tetrahedral vs Polyhedral

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   October 4, 2011, 14:53
Default Tetrahedral vs Polyhedral
  #1
New Member
 
rofluent
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 7
Rohini is on a distinguished road
Hi all,

I am trying to validate the efficiency of polyhedral meshes in capturing wall shear stress in blood vessels. For this, I create tetrahedral meshes using gambit and convert them to polyhedral using fluent. However, when I am comparing the WSS distribution between polyhedral and the original tetrahedral meshes, the polyhedral seems to underestimate WSS. Has anyone had this problem before? Your suggestions are appreciated.

Thanks
Rohini is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 4, 2011, 16:46
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Amir's Avatar
 
Amir
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Shiraz, Iran
Posts: 739
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 14
Amir is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rohini View Post
Hi all,

I am trying to validate the efficiency of polyhedral meshes in capturing wall shear stress in blood vessels. For this, I create tetrahedral meshes using gambit and convert them to polyhedral using fluent. However, when I am comparing the WSS distribution between polyhedral and the original tetrahedral meshes, the polyhedral seems to underestimate WSS. Has anyone had this problem before? Your suggestions are appreciated.

Thanks
Hi,

I also had few investigations concerning WSS in human tissues and upon my experience non of these types were good choices. In my case, WSS was very sensitive to boundary element especially smoothness of grid lines on boundaries. Finally I could validate my numerical results just with proper mapped hexahedral cells with smooth grid lines. I think the main issue of other element types is normal vector of boundary faces which may deviate from origin one. Another tip, note that in many softwares like FLUENT (at least in 6.3 ver.) wall traction is reported instead of WSS, so if you want tangential stress you'll need some post processing steps. Hope that help you.

Bests,
__________________
Amir
Amir is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 4, 2011, 16:55
Default
  #3
New Member
 
rofluent
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 7
Rohini is on a distinguished road
Hi Amir,

Thanks for your response. What exactly do you mean by smoothness of grid lines on boundaries? Is it the boundary layer thickness you are talking about? Also, I am using fluent 12.1 and I am able to visualize Wall shear in fluent itself. However even velocity distribution for some planes that visualized seemed to be lower in polyhedral case.
Rohini is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 5, 2011, 09:20
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Amir's Avatar
 
Amir
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Shiraz, Iran
Posts: 739
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 14
Amir is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rohini View Post
What exactly do you mean by smoothness of grid lines on boundaries? Is it the boundary layer thickness you are talking about?
Hi,

No, I meant that slope of grid lines should be continuous @ boundaries when we compare structure grid @ boundaries. (something when you use multi-zone topology, this feature may occur). Unfortunately, wss results for any pave topologies @ boundaries were not satisfactory.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rohini View Post
Also, I am using fluent 12.1 and I am able to visualize Wall shear in fluent itself. However even velocity distribution for some planes that visualized seemed to be lower in polyhedral case.
I know that, I just wanted to warn you about a bug which I saw in FLUENT ver 6.3 and I'm not sure it's removed in new versions or not. You can also see WSS in 6.3 versions but it's wall traction not wss!
__________________
Amir
Amir is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
fluent, polyhedral, tetrahedral meshing

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
polyhedral cells bill Main CFD Forum 10 March 11, 2014 07:52
is possible to do tetrahedral or polyhedral mesh OpenFoam?? Ale_galleria OpenFOAM Meshing Format & General Technical 2 January 11, 2011 07:06
is possible to do tetrahedral or polyhedral mesh using snappyHexMesh?? Ale_galleria OpenFOAM Native Meshers: snappyHexMesh and Others 1 September 15, 2010 12:00
Polyhedral in parallel drdr18 FLUENT 5 April 3, 2009 17:56
Numerical error in tetrahedral cells Sam Main CFD Forum 1 February 14, 2009 15:51


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:47.