|
[Sponsors] |
March 25, 2015, 22:18 |
|
#21 | |
New Member
masoudeh
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 11 |
Quote:
pathline.jpg for particle track the streams are incomplete! i will also provide fig for this |
||
March 25, 2015, 22:25 |
|
#22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 892
Rep Power: 18 |
Where is the mesh (display the outline only to avoid cluttering) to see the overall shape of the domain? What path lines are you expecting?
You've just quoted my post on how to solve the "incomplete" particle tracking issue, please read carefully... |
|
March 26, 2015, 09:42 |
|
#23 | |
New Member
masoudeh
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 11 |
Quote:
I think i do not understand your question clearly, but the max number of steps for tracking is 500.. this is the path line i expect to seepathline expected.jpg and this my particle track which i said it is incompleteparticle track.jpg and this is the path line i got with outline mesh ( i am not sure if u were asking me this!)pathlines meshjpg.jpg |
||
March 26, 2015, 19:17 |
|
#24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 892
Rep Power: 18 |
If the particles are incomplete at the end of the simulation then that would indicate they require more steps until they leave the domain.
Your task: change the maximum number of steps for tracking from 500 to say 50,000. |
|
March 26, 2015, 20:16 |
|
#25 | |
New Member
masoudeh
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 11 |
Quote:
Would you please tell me if i just use eulerian approach can it consider the brownian motion? |
||
March 26, 2015, 21:43 |
|
#26 |
New Member
masoudeh
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 11 |
I have a message" temperature limited to.." what does it mean? What should I do, does it affect my results? I got results but they not exactly what i expected.
|
|
March 26, 2015, 23:24 |
|
#27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 892
Rep Power: 18 |
Tackle one issue at a time: have you tried a tracking simulation after increasing the maximum number of steps for tracking to remove the "incomplete" particle problem?
|
|
March 27, 2015, 10:10 |
|
#28 |
New Member
masoudeh
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 11 |
||
March 27, 2015, 20:40 |
|
#29 | |
New Member
masoudeh
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 11 |
Quote:
I got the message that the temperature is limited to..and when i remove the limit form temperature the outlet temperature the software gave me was out of range. Can you help me how to solve it? |
||
March 28, 2015, 01:45 |
|
#30 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 892
Rep Power: 18 |
Have a read of the Fluent FAQ section on convergence issues and we'll go from there.
|
|
March 29, 2015, 23:13 |
|
#31 | |
New Member
masoudeh
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 11 |
Quote:
I read this part it said the momentum and pressure should be 0.6 and 0.1. I changed mine (pressure 1 and momentum 0.7) to these numbers it becomes worse than before, it gave me the reverse flow message and then increasing sweep and then it said no divergence. these errors came in the first iterations!! it also said to set k and eps to 0.4 which i could not find out where should i set these. |
||
March 29, 2015, 23:25 |
|
#32 | |
New Member
masoudeh
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 11 |
Quote:
2. does eulerian consider interaction between particles? or just eulerian with lagragian could consider this interaction? Thanks |
||
March 30, 2015, 00:12 |
|
#33 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 892
Rep Power: 18 |
1. When did this temperature limited error arise, did the simulation previously work and then did you change something?
2. The one- or two-way coupling between the discrete phase (Lagrangian) and continuous phase (Eulerian) dictates the interaction between particles, or lack thereof. Both of these options are available in the DPM of Fluent. Have a read of the "Modeling Discrete Phase" chapter of the user's guide. |
|
March 30, 2015, 13:48 |
|
#34 | |
New Member
masoudeh
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 11 |
Quote:
2. As it gave me good results with eulerian i preferred to work with eulerian but i was wondering if particles interaction (brownian motion) could be considered in eulerian model?! I know i can use two way coupling but need to be sure eulerian consider solid particles interactions. I read it but still need to know. please give me your opinion. Thanks |
||
March 30, 2015, 16:39 |
|
#35 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 892
Rep Power: 18 |
1. Terminology: you're not using DPM if there are no injections. Ensure you're not exceeding the limits of DPM (particle volume fraction etc).
2. I'm familiar with the DPM but not the Euler-Euler approach of modelling particles in a fluid. If your simulations are working in the Eulerian reference frame, then that's great, but you'll need to check the user's manual (or theory guide) for checking how it treats diffusion / Brownian motion. |
|
March 31, 2015, 16:48 |
|
#36 | |
New Member
masoudeh
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 11 |
Quote:
Would you please tell me why i got this "temperature limit " error and how can i fix it? |
||
March 31, 2015, 18:30 |
|
#37 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 892
Rep Power: 18 |
||
March 31, 2015, 19:42 |
|
#38 |
New Member
masoudeh
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 11 |
||
March 31, 2015, 21:29 |
|
#39 | |
New Member
masoudeh
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 11 |
Quote:
1. i put 3 particles for the cone , i expect i see 3 streams. why i see just 1 stream? 2. i need to see the location of each particle. i mean i want to find out particles motion. can u tell me how should i set particle track to display it for me? i could not find any option in particle track that display the location of each of these 3 particles! |
||
March 31, 2015, 22:20 |
|
#40 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 892
Rep Power: 18 |
Have a read of the user's guide and tutorials on visualising particle streams; all of your questions are answered there in step by step detail.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Superlinear speedup in OpenFOAM 13 | msrinath80 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 18 | March 3, 2015 05:36 |
Does lagrangian track model support moving mesh with topological changes?? | su_junwei | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | October 18, 2012 03:53 |
Lagrangian Particle Tracking model In CFX | Kushagra | CFX | 8 | December 2, 2010 21:18 |
eulerian model | mvee | FLUENT | 1 | December 6, 2007 11:47 |
DPM + Eulerian Model | Shane | FLUENT | 2 | July 14, 2004 08:26 |