CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

porous catalytic reactor

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   November 25, 2011, 07:07
Default porous catalytic reactor
  #1
New Member
 
golshadi
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 5
golshadi is on a distinguished road
hi Dears
My work is about a catalytic reaction in porous media.I study the user guide of fluent but my mind is wandered to very things and I have very questions. (anyone that have good information) I would like guide me to best books, texts,sites, in this subject or even give me a case file and other things you think them help me.
in first stage I don't know how can determine permeability of porous media. And what is the best under-relaxation for a homogeneous porous media(because my case doesn't convergevery well).
also when can I use porous media model for packed bed catalysts(what is criterion?).
I have a non-Arrhenius rate equation (surface reaction in porous media) what is the best way to present it to fluent?
I appreciate you.
regards
golshadi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 26, 2011, 05:16
Default Re
  #2
Senior Member
 
shoeb khan
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 179
Rep Power: 5
shk12345 is on a distinguished road
Try to use the Eurgun equation for inertial and viscous resistances for the packed bed.

SHK
shk12345 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 18, 2011, 16:37
Default
  #3
New Member
 
golshadi
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 5
golshadi is on a distinguished road
thanks shoeb khan.
now the problems are about two things:
1-I have in my case a non-Arrhenius rate equation, so for entering it in fluent should I do?
2- I have a principle problem: in my case the diameter of catalyst is about 0.06 mm, I dont know with this diameter, whether it is right to use porous model? or I should use multiphase model (granular , packed bed) ? ((what is the criterion??))

Last edited by golshadi; December 20, 2011 at 15:25.
golshadi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 18, 2011, 19:01
Default
  #4
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 95
Rep Power: 5
Sixkillers is on a distinguished road
You can define your custom reaction rate with UDF by using macro DEFINE_VR_RATE.
Sixkillers is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 20, 2011, 15:28
Default
  #5
New Member
 
golshadi
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 5
golshadi is on a distinguished road
DEFINE_VR_RATE or DEFINE_SR_RATE??
do you have any suggestion about my second problem?
golshadi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 21, 2011, 16:48
Default
  #6
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 95
Rep Power: 5
Sixkillers is on a distinguished road
Hi. Sorry my bad, DEFINE_SR_RATE is definitely more suitable for your case. I have only used granular model for simulation solid-liquid system in a stirred tank. Speaking of convergence, I usually set under-relaxation of momentum to 0.2 and after simulation starts converging I return it to its default value, which is 0.7.
Sixkillers is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 22, 2011, 09:57
Default
  #7
New Member
 
golshadi
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 5
golshadi is on a distinguished road
Hi.
I want to express my gratitude for your suggestions. You've useful suggestions for me.

my case about gas (flow) and solid (catalyst). Do you have any comment about this case?
golshadi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 23, 2011, 11:44
Default
  #8
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 95
Rep Power: 5
Sixkillers is on a distinguished road
From my point of view porous media model seems to be more rigorous, but on the other hand it requires much more input parameters, so it depends if you can provide suitable values to Fluent. By contrast granular & packed bed model requires only particle diameter and packing limit (i.e. 1 - void fraction). Packed bed model means that velocity field of solid phase is freezed and isn't floating in a reactor. From my simulation of solid-liquid phase I have found that granular model converge more rapidly for particles with smaller diameter (e.g. 1e-6 m) then for larger one (1e-3 m). So your particles (0.06 mm) shouldn't be be a problem for it.
Sixkillers is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 23, 2011, 12:11
Default
  #9
New Member
 
golshadi
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 5
golshadi is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sixkillers View Post
From my point of view porous media model seems to be more rigorous, but on the other hand it requires much more input parameters, so it depends if you can provide suitable values to Fluent. By contrast granular & packed bed model requires only particle diameter and packing limit (i.e. 1 - void fraction). Packed bed model means that velocity field of solid phase is freezed and isn't floating in a reactor. From my simulation of solid-liquid phase I have found that granular model converge more rapidly for particles with smaller diameter (e.g. 1e-6 m) then for larger one (1e-3 m). So your particles (0.06 mm) shouldn't be be a problem for it.
your comments really helped me.thank a lot.
If you have any reference about this problem please guide me to it.
thanks again
golshadi is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CFD analysis of packed bed reactor with porous catalysts goswami.sandeepan Main CFD Forum 1 November 30, 2011 09:17
Modelling Combustion in Porous Zone tanjinjack FLUENT 0 November 19, 2010 12:23
Porous media of a catalytic converter for diesel engine jackr84 ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 0 January 14, 2010 12:47
porous medium and reactions Valeria FLUENT 1 July 10, 2009 03:58
catalytic combustion porous media Ali FLUENT 0 October 19, 2005 12:05


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:28.