# Nusselt number in microchannel

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 December 8, 2011, 23:27 Nusselt number in microchannel #1 New Member   micro77 Join Date: Dec 2011 Posts: 5 Rep Power: 5 Dear All, I am doing simulation to analyse flow and heat transfer in nanofluid-cooled rectangular microchannel. It is a rectangular box with rectangular microchannel inside. The main problem is that as I increase the volume fraction, the Nusselt number going down which is contradict to previous researcher. For my simulation: i. I already did grid independence test with 5 diff. meshes. ii. My BC are: inlet vel at the inlet with T=293K, pressure outlet=0 gage and To=293K, top heat sink wall with constant heat flux, q"=650kW/m2. I also coupled the solid-liquid interface. iii. Tref=inlet temperature, L=hyd. diameter. iv. I calculated Nu in 2 ways: a) Nu=q"*D/(Tw-Tb)*k where Tw=T at top channel Tb=T at the centerline of channel I create a line at top channel & the centerline to get Tw and Tb while q"=-k(T top heat sink - T top channel)/z where z=normal distance to the flow b) Nu=q"*D/(Tw-Tb)*k but q" is taken directly from average value on top channel line. My question is: i. How did i get decrease in Nusselt number with increase in nanoparticle volume fraction? ii. During setting up the BC for solid liquid interface, I set the wall thickness & heat generation =0. As far as I know, the coupled wall shows that the heat from the top can go through the wall to the channel. Am I right? iii. I also create boundary layer in Gambit but no different in results shown. I welcome any view/ suggestions. Thank you in advanced.

 December 9, 2011, 04:11 #2 Member   Shashank Join Date: Apr 2011 Posts: 70 Rep Power: 6 Are you increasing the volume fraction of the liquid or the vapor?

 December 9, 2011, 09:18 #3 New Member   micro77 Join Date: Dec 2011 Posts: 5 Rep Power: 5 I increase the nano particle volume fraction from 1 to 4%. I did simulate using several different equations used for nanofluid thermal properties. And I also try run with calculated values given in later research but again, the same result, even though the paper got increase in Nu number with increase in vol. fract. I did check my data base, again & again. I do not know what goes wrong here.

 December 9, 2011, 09:20 #4 New Member   micro77 Join Date: Dec 2011 Posts: 5 Rep Power: 5 The nanofluid is alumina with water base. So, I increase the alumina vol. fraction (solid ).

 December 9, 2011, 16:38 #5 Member   Shashank Join Date: Apr 2011 Posts: 70 Rep Power: 6 Wait, which MODEL are you using? It cannot be VOF, it has to be some other Eulerian model which considers fluid and solid phases as one continuum. Let me ask you one more question before I answer your query. Are you doing a nanofluid jet impingement on a heated surface?!

 December 10, 2011, 10:43 #6 New Member   micro77 Join Date: Dec 2011 Posts: 5 Rep Power: 5 I apply single-phase first before going to multi phase model. Forced convection flow.

 March 3, 2014, 13:56 same problem, did u get the sollution ?if so,plz reply #7 New Member   Akshay Gupta Join Date: Dec 2013 Posts: 2 Rep Power: 0 [getting same problem if u have got the solloution plz reply ]Dear All, I am doing simulation to analyse flow and heat transfer in nanofluid-cooled rectangular microchannel. It is a rectangular box with rectangular microchannel inside. The main problem is that as I increase the volume fraction, the Nusselt number going down which is contradict to previous researcher. For my simulation: i. I already did grid independence test with 5 diff. meshes. ii. My BC are: inlet vel at the inlet with T=293K, pressure outlet=0 gage and To=293K, top heat sink wall with constant heat flux, q"=650kW/m2. I also coupled the solid-liquid interface. iii. Tref=inlet temperature, L=hyd. diameter. iv. I calculated Nu in 2 ways: a) Nu=q"*D/(Tw-Tb)*k where Tw=T at top channel Tb=T at the centerline of channel I create a line at top channel & the centerline to get Tw and Tb while q"=-k(T top heat sink - T top channel)/z where z=normal distance to the flow b) Nu=q"*D/(Tw-Tb)*k but q" is taken directly from average value on top channel line. My question is: i. How did i get decrease in Nusselt number with increase in nanoparticle volume fraction? ii. During setting up the BC for solid liquid interface, I set the wall thickness & heat generation =0. As far as I know, the coupled wall shows that the heat from the top can go through the wall to the channel. Am I right? iii. I also create boundary layer in Gambit but no different in results shown. I welcome any view/ suggestions. Thank you in advanced.[/QUOTE]

 March 3, 2014, 14:08 Nusselt number is decreasing when using nanofluid using single phase phase approach #8 New Member   Akshay Gupta Join Date: Dec 2013 Posts: 2 Rep Power: 0 Hi, i have used single phase approach for calculating the enhancement in HTC in a flow through a channel ,for the same first i have calculated the HTC (both local along the wall surface and Avg) for plane water without any nanofluid thereafter i have inputted the thermophysical properties of water+nanoparticle properties but the HTC is decreasing which is contrary to literature. the BC are : inlet v= temp 293 k outlet =outflow wall temp=310 k in reference values i have changed the length value to be the hydraulic dia and for temp=the tbulk i have approached two method 1)made a centerline in the channel and calculated the weighted ag along the line 2)(outlet+inlet)/2 but in both these cases the HTC and NU is decreasing Plz help in telling why there is an anomaly of the current analysis with literature..... thanks in advance

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Sharadkumar Yeri FLUENT 36 June 5, 2015 05:08 SeRGeiSarov Main CFD Forum 4 May 6, 2009 01:57 hjasak OpenFOAM Native Meshers: blockMesh 11 August 15, 2008 07:36 michele OpenFOAM Other Meshers: ICEM, Star, Ansys, Pointwise, GridPro, Ansa, ... 2 July 15, 2005 04:15 chinmay FLUENT 4 May 31, 2001 03:06

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:12.