CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Nusselt number in microchannel

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   December 8, 2011, 23:27
Default Nusselt number in microchannel
  #1
New Member
 
micro77
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 5
micro77 is on a distinguished road
Dear All,

I am doing simulation to analyse flow and heat transfer in nanofluid-cooled rectangular microchannel. It is a rectangular box with rectangular microchannel inside. The main problem is that as I increase the volume fraction, the Nusselt number going down which is contradict to previous researcher. For my simulation:

i. I already did grid independence test with 5 diff. meshes.
ii. My BC are: inlet vel at the inlet with T=293K, pressure outlet=0 gage and To=293K, top heat sink wall with constant heat flux, q"=650kW/m2. I also coupled the solid-liquid interface.
iii. Tref=inlet temperature, L=hyd. diameter.
iv. I calculated Nu in 2 ways:
a) Nu=q"*D/(Tw-Tb)*k where Tw=T at top channel
Tb=T at the centerline of channel
I create a line at top channel & the centerline to get Tw and Tb

while q"=-k(T top heat sink - T top channel)/z

where z=normal distance to the flow

b) Nu=q"*D/(Tw-Tb)*k but q" is taken directly from average value on top channel line.

My question is:
i. How did i get decrease in Nusselt number with increase in nanoparticle volume fraction?
ii. During setting up the BC for solid liquid interface, I set the wall thickness & heat generation =0. As far as I know, the coupled wall shows that the heat from the top can go through the wall to the channel. Am I right?
iii. I also create boundary layer in Gambit but no different in results shown.

I welcome any view/ suggestions.

Thank you in advanced.
micro77 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 9, 2011, 04:11
Default
  #2
Member
 
Shashank
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 70
Rep Power: 6
shashank312 is on a distinguished road
Are you increasing the volume fraction of the liquid or the vapor?
shashank312 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 9, 2011, 09:18
Default
  #3
New Member
 
micro77
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 5
micro77 is on a distinguished road
I increase the nano particle volume fraction from 1 to 4%. I did simulate using several different equations used for nanofluid thermal properties. And I also try run with calculated values given in later research but again, the same result, even though the paper got increase in Nu number with increase in vol. fract. I did check my data base, again & again. I do not know what goes wrong here.
micro77 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 9, 2011, 09:20
Default
  #4
New Member
 
micro77
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 5
micro77 is on a distinguished road
The nanofluid is alumina with water base. So, I increase the alumina vol. fraction (solid ).
micro77 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 9, 2011, 16:38
Default
  #5
Member
 
Shashank
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 70
Rep Power: 6
shashank312 is on a distinguished road
Wait, which MODEL are you using? It cannot be VOF, it has to be some other Eulerian model which considers fluid and solid phases as one continuum.

Let me ask you one more question before I answer your query. Are you doing a nanofluid jet impingement on a heated surface?!
shashank312 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 10, 2011, 10:43
Default
  #6
New Member
 
micro77
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 5
micro77 is on a distinguished road
I apply single-phase first before going to multi phase model. Forced convection flow.
micro77 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 3, 2014, 13:56
Post same problem, did u get the sollution ?if so,plz reply
  #7
New Member
 
Akshay Gupta
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
akshaygupta is on a distinguished road
[getting same problem if u have got the solloution plz reply
]Dear All,

I am doing simulation to analyse flow and heat transfer in nanofluid-cooled rectangular microchannel. It is a rectangular box with rectangular microchannel inside. The main problem is that as I increase the volume fraction, the Nusselt number going down which is contradict to previous researcher. For my simulation:

i. I already did grid independence test with 5 diff. meshes.
ii. My BC are: inlet vel at the inlet with T=293K, pressure outlet=0 gage and To=293K, top heat sink wall with constant heat flux, q"=650kW/m2. I also coupled the solid-liquid interface.
iii. Tref=inlet temperature, L=hyd. diameter.
iv. I calculated Nu in 2 ways:
a) Nu=q"*D/(Tw-Tb)*k where Tw=T at top channel
Tb=T at the centerline of channel
I create a line at top channel & the centerline to get Tw and Tb

while q"=-k(T top heat sink - T top channel)/z

where z=normal distance to the flow

b) Nu=q"*D/(Tw-Tb)*k but q" is taken directly from average value on top channel line.

My question is:
i. How did i get decrease in Nusselt number with increase in nanoparticle volume fraction?
ii. During setting up the BC for solid liquid interface, I set the wall thickness & heat generation =0. As far as I know, the coupled wall shows that the heat from the top can go through the wall to the channel. Am I right?
iii. I also create boundary layer in Gambit but no different in results shown.

I welcome any view/ suggestions.

Thank you in advanced.[/QUOTE]
akshaygupta is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 3, 2014, 14:08
Question Nusselt number is decreasing when using nanofluid using single phase phase approach
  #8
New Member
 
Akshay Gupta
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
akshaygupta is on a distinguished road
Hi,
i have used single phase approach for calculating the enhancement in HTC in a flow through a channel ,for the same first i have calculated the HTC (both local along the wall surface and Avg) for plane water without any nanofluid thereafter i have inputted the thermophysical properties of water+nanoparticle properties but the HTC is decreasing which is contrary to literature.
the BC are :
inlet v=
temp 293 k
outlet =outflow
wall temp=310 k
in reference values i have changed the length value to be the hydraulic dia
and for temp=the tbulk i have approached two method
1)made a centerline in the channel and calculated the weighted ag along the line
2)(outlet+inlet)/2

but in both these cases the HTC and NU is decreasing
Plz help in telling why there is an anomaly of the current analysis with literature.....

thanks in advance
akshaygupta is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Nusselt number calculation in Fluent Sharadkumar Yeri FLUENT 36 June 5, 2015 05:08
How to calculate Nusselt number SeRGeiSarov Main CFD Forum 4 May 6, 2009 01:57
BlockMeshmergePatchPairs hjasak OpenFOAM Native Meshers: blockMesh 11 August 15, 2008 07:36
Trimmed cell and embedded refinement mesh conversion issues michele OpenFOAM Other Meshers: ICEM, Star, Ansys, Pointwise, GridPro, Ansa, ... 2 July 15, 2005 04:15
Nusselt Number of the order of 35000 chinmay FLUENT 4 May 31, 2001 03:06


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:34.