|February 22, 2012, 14:00||
k-w SST with or without Low Re Correction?
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 4Rep Power: 5
I am simulating an airfoil with reynolds numbers between 200,000 and 900,000 using the k-omega SST model and was wondering if I should be using the low Re correction option? When I turn it on, there seems to be separation bubbles that get closer to the leading edge as the Re increases, although when compared with Xfoil it predicts the bubbles a lot closer to the trailing edge. When the low Re correction is off, there don't appear to be any separation bubbles at all.
Any help would be much appreciated!
Last edited by orion; February 22, 2012 at 20:07.
|September 26, 2012, 09:18||
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Thessaloniki, Greece
Posts: 163Rep Power: 9
I would also like to know this.
Low-Reynolds correction in k-omega refers to the reference Reynolds number of the problem or the boundary layer grid resolution?
If it refers to the reference Reynolds, then what is considered as Low?
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Low Reynolds Number SST Model||Josh||CFX||39||February 19, 2014 09:47|
|How to use SST Curvature Correction||mike wilson||CFX||11||December 19, 2010 17:04|
|Very Low Re: SST vs. v2-f?||CAVT||Main CFD Forum||0||September 25, 2010 04:34|
|Low Inlet Turb. Intensity - SST model not converge||Pete||CFX||0||November 12, 2005 02:26|
|Multicomponent fluid||Andrea||CFX||2||October 11, 2004 05:12|