CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

DPM simulation convergence problem

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   March 6, 2012, 11:03
Default DPM simulation convergence problem
  #1
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Istanbul, Turkiye
Posts: 47
Rep Power: 17
gemini is on a distinguished road
Hi users,

I am trying to model the flow of pulverised coal (dilute phase vol frac < % 10) in a rectangular duct with bend using DPM in FLUENT. I have a convergence problem to be tackled.

In my simulation I both monitored the residuals and velocity profile at the exit and velocity profile did not converged. I got the same behaviour for each strategy i tried below. I also checked max. DPM concentration in the domain for vol. frac. < %10 condition and it is satisfied. Stochastic tracking was enabled. Both particle tracking and flow are treated steady. Realizable k-epsilon was used with full buoyancy. Flow field simulation without interaction with particles converges very well.

Strategies tried (ref: http://www.bakker.org/dartmouth06/engs150/15-dpm.pdf)
– Closer coupling between dispersed and continuous flow:
• Increase underrelaxation for discrete phase.
• Decrease number of continuous phase calculations between trajectory
calculations to less than three.
• Reduce underrelaxation factors for continuous phase.
– Decoupling of dispersed and continuous flow:
• Reduce underrelaxation factor for discrete phase.
• Increase number of continuous phase calculations between trajectory
calculations to more than fifteen.
Any recommendation will be appreciated.

Thanks.

Last edited by gemini; March 6, 2012 at 14:04.
gemini is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 6, 2012, 17:00
Default
  #2
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 15
semo is on a distinguished road
is this just particle transport or also combustion?

istanbulda nerden?
semo is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 22, 2012, 02:41
Default Two way coupling in DPM
  #3
Member
 
subha_meter's Avatar
 
Subhasish Mitra
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 16
subha_meter is on a distinguished road
Hi All,

Could anyone tell how 2-way coupling in DPM simulation is achieved? I have solved the continuous flow field and then created the DPM injection. Is it by lowering the URF for DPM source terms and interaction number between continuous phase and discrete phase?

A suggestion will be highly appreciated.

Regards,
__________________
SM
subha_meter is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Convergence problem with axial pump simulation! cnchilavert CFX 2 October 5, 2011 05:23
Need URGENT HELP for convergence problem of a turbine Pursuor CFX 5 October 3, 2011 18:44
Heat Transfer simulation: No convergence problem fiqs CFX 2 April 21, 2010 16:47
Submerged fin, Convergence problem supermouniette FLUENT 10 July 6, 2009 11:47
transient simulation: natural convection problem? Basics CFX 3 September 25, 2002 10:42


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:35.