|March 22, 2012, 07:01||
Particle Transport and Mesh Cell Size
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 451Rep Power: 14
For an incompressible flow with particle tracking is there guidelines on how small mesh cells should be?
For example: should a mesh be sized so that a particle is expected to move cross a cell face per time step? Or perhaps move every 2nd timestep?
|March 22, 2012, 08:58||
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 39Rep Power: 6
it probably depends on the particle properties, e.g. dimension, velocity. for example, very small and slow particles would need a highly refined mesh, of the order of the particles themselves, to ensure they can move at least in one cell/time step, but this would probably mean to use a four-way coupling between the fluid and the particles (solving for the turbulence of wakes around the particles), which isn't allowed in the DPM point-particle tracking (where the particle volume fraction is neglected).
on the other hand, a highly refined mesh would allow the Fluent particles, which are cluster of particles, to represent a more realistic mass of actual particles
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Transport mesh from ICEM CFD, to Fluent, to Sysnoise||Wieland||FLUENT||2||April 15, 2012 06:28|
|Instability in transport solution on tet mesh||mpeti||OpenFOAM||5||October 18, 2011 11:25|
|Questions for a species transport problems (snapshots attached)||aleisia||FLUENT||2||October 9, 2011 04:40|
|InterDyMfoam gives strange gamme if cell volume changes due to mesh motion||daniels||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||8||April 7, 2009 09:31|
|Phase locked average in run time||panara||OpenFOAM||2||February 20, 2008 15:37|