|
[Sponsors] |
[HELP] mass fraction in multi-component granular flow? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
March 15, 2012, 10:14 |
[HELP] mass fraction in multi-component granular flow?
|
#1 |
Member
Li Huang
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 15 |
Hi all,
I am trying out FLUENT Mixture multiphase model to solve multi-component granular flow. I have two velocity inlets and one pressure outlet. The fluid is air, and the secondary phases are multi-component particles of different sizes. At these two inlets, the mass fraction of each component (species) is different. For example, (0.2A+0.8B) at inlet 1 and (0.5A+0.5B) at inlet 2. Even with no chemical reaction or mass transfer between phases, it seems the mass fractions of secondary phases are not solved by FLUENT. Any ideas? BTW, I tried Eulerian model. It does solve for mass fraction of the secondary granular phases, but it did not converge well. And it takes much longer time so I dont want to consider Eulerian model for now (unless absolutely necessary). |
|
March 15, 2012, 12:36 |
|
#2 |
Member
Domenico
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 39
Rep Power: 14 |
hi
how big are the particles? how concentrated is the initial flow? do the particles enter the domain in (quasi) mechanical equilibrium? regards |
|
March 15, 2012, 12:56 |
|
#3 | |
Member
Li Huang
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 15 |
Quote:
Particles are very small with diameters in the range of nm to micrometers. The volume fraction of particles from inlet is around 1E-10. But what does it mean by being in mechanical equilibrium? How do I specify it? |
||
March 15, 2012, 13:05 |
|
#4 |
Member
Domenico
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 39
Rep Power: 14 |
...if the particles enter the domain with the same, or similar, velocity.
why not to use the DPM (discrete phase model)? has your grid a high resolution? regards |
|
March 15, 2012, 13:20 |
|
#5 | |
Member
Li Huang
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 15 |
Quote:
I dont have a very high resolution grid right now. But I plan to do so. |
||
March 15, 2012, 13:43 |
|
#6 |
Member
Domenico
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 39
Rep Power: 14 |
it indeed depends on the goals, but in general a particle concentration like that isn't high. also, the number of tracked particles depends a lot on the grid, because they are treated as cluster of particles, so I don't expect you would have a prohibitive number of trajectories.
in a first approximation you could consider your small particles as fully coupled to the fluid, and treat the mixture as multispecies (Fluent multispecies model), i.e. air (species 1) + pseudofluid (species 2, with its properties modified by the particles, e.g. increased density and viscosity; Marble 1970, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.). in this second case, you could directly follow the species mass fraction, but of course you cannot have the particles leave the fluid transport system |
|
March 15, 2012, 14:03 |
|
#7 | |
Member
Li Huang
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 15 |
Quote:
As I have already done quite some work based on the mixture model, I would like to figure out how to solve mass fraction of the secondary granular phases. I don't mind creating UDFs either. |
||
March 15, 2012, 14:37 |
|
#8 |
Member
Domenico
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 39
Rep Power: 14 |
I'm not too much familiar with the mixture model, but I think it's basically similar to a pseudofluid approach, with the difference it solves for the relative velocities, as well as the volume fraction of the secondary phase. This is done with some algebric expressions for the velocities, and a volume fraction equation for the secondary phase
|
|
March 16, 2012, 10:54 |
|
#9 |
Member
Li Huang
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 15 |
I checked the FLUENT theory guide again, and it says DPM is not compatible with multiphase species transport.
|
|
March 26, 2012, 15:59 |
|
#10 |
Member
Li Huang
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 15 |
I found what causes this is probably i am using too low volume concentration of the secondary phase. In my case I have to deal with volume fractions as low as 1e-20 or lower. But it seems FLUENT double precision solver works fine on mass fraction for secondary phase volume fractions greater then 1e-08. Anything smaller than that becomes 0.
Any idea to work around it? |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Error message: Insufficient Catalogue Size | Paresh Jain | CFX | 32 | February 3, 2021 04:37 |
Mass flow rate: calculation v/s computation | beguxa | FLUENT | 5 | December 2, 2018 22:02 |
Convergence problem with target mass flow rate | ADL | FLUENT | 2 | May 29, 2012 22:11 |
Difference between Volume Fraction and Mass Fraction in CEL | foo7 | CFX | 0 | September 21, 2011 09:45 |
Mass flow rate through each cell | Babakjingo | Main CFD Forum | 0 | August 21, 2011 04:18 |