|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Jonas Bredberg
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
I've run two different case (one Fluent with 1M cells and one with CFX with 2M cells) on single CPU's.
The results are: Testcase: Fluent 6.2, MRF, ca 1M cells Start with 200iter, measure from 150iter Time CPU 23m30s core2 3.16GHz 24m36s xeon 3GHz 27m50s core2 3.0GHz 28m02s xeon5520(nehalem) 2.26GHz 29m43s core2 2.8GHz Testcase: CFX 12, ca 2M cells 20iterations Time CPU 1517s xeon5520 (nehalem) 2.26GHz 1296s xeon 3GHz 1603s core2 3.0GHz Thus it seems that nehalem at 2.26GHz is similar to a core2 at 3GHz, I was expecting more from this CPU. Has anyone similar experiance? /Jonas Ps core2 at 2.8Ghz is a oc e6300 (1.86GHz) with 800MHz DDR2 Ds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
New Member
HP Kritzinger
Join Date: May 2009
Location: South Africa
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 6 ![]() |
The strength of the Nehalem becomes evident when using more than one core on the CPU. Try the benchmarks by running a 2-way parallel run on each machine, or by running the benchmark on a machine where another job is running at the same time.
regards hp |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
New Member
Philipp Beierer
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 6 ![]() |
Thanks for the numbers! Interesting results.
:-) |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| BENCH MARKING ADVECTION-DIFFUSION | student | Main CFD Forum | 0 | November 12, 2008 10:09 |
| bench marking of 3dconvection-diffusion subroutine | INAM | Main CFD Forum | 0 | October 31, 2008 10:06 |
| meshing in work bench | sach | CFX | 0 | October 31, 2006 02:11 |
| fluent bench mark casting problem | prashanth | FLUENT | 0 | July 17, 2003 02:35 |
| Bench Mark - Vaporizing Drop Trajectory | R. Sureshkumar | Main CFD Forum | 5 | December 9, 1999 10:00 |