CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Hardware

Performance of Xeon X56-- 6 core

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   March 21, 2010, 18:13
Default Performance of Xeon X56-- 6 core
  #1
New Member
 
Susan
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 23
Rep Power: 7
hvem10 is on a distinguished road
While waiting for the new Xeon 8 core from Intel.
Does anyone have experience with the Xeon X5650,60,70,80 six core.
The price is competitive with the Xeon 4 core, X5550,60,70
I am interested in the parallel performance, It would be nice to know how well they would scale in a workstation with 2 Units, so up to 12 cores.
Thanks in advance
hvem10 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 29, 2010, 18:24
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Curtis Marsh
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
cmarsh is on a distinguished road
I've been doing some research for recent purchase and found the six core 56series processors slower per core than the same speed quad 55 series. My conclusion is that the bus speed/memory becomes the limiting factor.
Price wise you get more cores per machine with the 56 seriers but you have to buy a faster cpu to get the same 'per-core' performance.
So in the end I purchased two servers with two 5550 cpus in each as this was the best value for money.
So unless the bus speed/memory bandwidth is improved I'm not sure that the eight core cpus will be worth the $.
cmarsh is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 31, 2010, 12:54
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Susan
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 23
Rep Power: 7
hvem10 is on a distinguished road
it is my impression by comparing a few runs that the x56 is better in parallel performance, so with CFD for parallel computing it would selct the x56.
Think more tests are needed
hvem10 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 21, 2010, 15:54
Default
  #4
Member
 
Robert
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 86
Rep Power: 8
RobertB is on a distinguished road
A benchmark I saw for a CFD code showed the elapsed time the same for a 5570 and 5670, both running all cores. This would imply, at least for this code, that the 5570's cores can max out the memory bus and that more cores are no benefit.
RobertB is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 3, 2010, 10:55
Default
  #5
Member
 
Bram
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Belgium
Posts: 81
Rep Power: 8
bramv101 is on a distinguished road
1. depends on the size of your models, scaling only works up to a certain amount
2. over here 2*Xeon 5670, and i cant complain. I ll see if i have time to compare to the other 5500 workstation. My guess is that for bigger models it is certainly worth it
bramv101 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Superlinear speedup in OpenFOAM 13 msrinath80 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 18 March 3, 2015 06:36
4 core & 8 core: same 64bit XP, Xeon, x5570, 2.93GHZ leeruoyun CFX 4 August 19, 2009 00:47
Dual Xeon PIV 3.8Ghz vs 2x Dual Core E5130 2.0 GHz Michiel Hardware 4 July 31, 2009 06:06
Core 2 Duo vc. Dual Core Xeon 3060 Jan Main CFD Forum 6 February 20, 2007 07:21
Performance of dual core AMD processors Imraan Parker FLUENT 1 September 9, 2005 08:04


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:19.