CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Hardware

Memory of PC for running fine mesh size

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   July 5, 2011, 02:44
Default Memory of PC for running fine mesh size
  #1
New Member
 
sepideh
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 5
sepidecent is on a distinguished road
Hello

Im running simulation with 8 million elements and more (maybe 10 million),the current PC with 12 GB Memory is not able to do the simulation because of lack of memory and I'm going to buy a new Dell desktop computer with 96GB(6*16GB) DDR3 RDIMM MEmory,1066MHz,ECC-but I'm not too sure if the new one is able to handle the simulation or not.I was wondering if any body could help me with the memory of PC I need for simulation.

Regards,
Sepideh
sepidecent is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 7, 2011, 16:17
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 637
Rep Power: 11
abdul099 is on a distinguished road
It depends on the software you are using and the complexity of your case.

For star-ccm+, as a rule of thumb, 1 million cells should use about 1GB memory on a standard case. So I recommend to monitor the memory usage when running one of your cases. Maybe there is just something else which uses too much memory (like operating system, CAD, firefox or whatever).

Anyway, 96GB should be much more than needed to run a 10 million cells case. On my 48GB workstation, I already run cases with up to 50 million cells (with star-ccm+).
abdul099 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 7, 2011, 18:50
Default
  #3
New Member
 
sepideh
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 5
sepidecent is on a distinguished road
Hi

Thank you for comment,I am using CFX12.
sepidecent is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 16, 2011, 07:48
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Stuart Buckingham
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 253
Rep Power: 15
stuart23 will become famous soon enough
Hi Sepideh,

Although there are rules of thumb out there to relate memory to mesh size, you must also remember that the each node is only an element of your entire simulation. If your simulation is simple, i.e. incompressible laminar flow, you can probably have a much finer mesh than if your simulation is more complex. Using LES, Reynolds Stress, multiphase etc etc will all add extra variables that need to be stored somewhere, and will therefore need more memory.

In my experience, I have done 80M element LES simulations and they have used over 200GB of memory. Using RANS models, they only used 40-50GB though.

Also, if you are solving large simulations on a single or dual socket computer, do not expect fast convergence!!! There are some very high end multi socket server boards out there as well, but the Quick Pass Interconnect may not be able to keep up with all the processors. Have you considered parallelisation?

Stu
stuart23 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 16, 2011, 20:43
Default
  #5
New Member
 
sepideh
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 5
sepidecent is on a distinguished road
Hi stuart23

Thanks for reply.

Cheers,
Sepideh
sepidecent is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
snappyHexMesh won't work - zeros everywhere! sc298 OpenFOAM Native Meshers: snappyHexMesh and Others 2 March 27, 2011 21:11
[ICEM] Help with fixing imported IGES model siw ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 24 August 24, 2010 11:22
Phase locked average in run time panara OpenFOAM 2 February 20, 2008 14:37
Icemcfd 11: Loss of mesh from surface mesh option? Joe CFX 2 March 26, 2007 18:10
core memory/ mesh size oliver Main CFD Forum 1 September 11, 1998 06:30


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 15:35.