CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Hardware

Which is better for CFD 4 core i7-2600 or AMD 8 core FX-8150?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree3Likes
  • 3 Post By scipy

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   January 8, 2012, 10:56
Default Which is better for CFD 4 core i7-2600 or AMD 8 core FX-8150?
  #1
New Member
 
Greg Shaffer
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
GregShaffer is on a distinguished road
Which is better for CFD? A faster 4 core cpu or does AMD having 8 cores make up for it being slower?

Has anyone done any benchmarks for CFD?
GregShaffer is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 8, 2012, 16:41
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Sebek
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 6
GTCo8 is on a distinguished road
Look here:

AMD FX 8-core or 6-core?
GTCo8 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 13, 2012, 07:43
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
scipy's Avatar
 
Alex Pasic
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Croatia
Posts: 184
Rep Power: 7
scipy is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to scipy
I've actually done a bit more testing over more iterations and with i7's HT turned on vs the FX8150, here are the results:

First batch of test for the i7-2600k:

1. HyperThreading = off (only physical cores used) @ stock speed (3.4 GHz)

on 4 cores = 31.6 seconds/iteration (1st order disc.)
on 4 cores = 32.9 seconds/iteration (2nd order disc.)
on 3 cores = 35.2 seconds/iteration (1st order disc.)
on 3 cores = 36.8 seconds/iteration (2nd order disc.)

2. HyperThreading = off @ overclocked 4.5 GHz

on 4 cores = 30.5 seconds/iteration (1st order disc.)
on 4 cores = 32.6 seconds/iteration (2nd order disc.)
on 3 cores = 34.0 sec/iter (1st order disc.)
on 3 cores = 35.6 sec/iter (2nd order disc.)

Second batch of test for the i7-2600k:

1. HyperThreading = on (real + virtual cores used) @ overclocked 4.5 GHz

on 8 cores = 28.0 sec/iter (1st order disc.)
on 8 cores = 29.5 sec/iter (2nd order disc.)
on 7 cores = 28.7 sec/iter (1st order disc.)
on 7 cores = 30.4 sec/iter (2nd order disc.)

Tests on the FX 8150:

on 8 cores = 25.2 sec/iter (1st order disc.)
on 8 cores = 26.0 sec/iter (2nd order disc.)
on 7 cores = 25.8 sec/iter (1st order disc.)
on 7 cores = 27.1 sec/iter (2nd order disc.)

Conclusions

Even though ANSYS says HyperThreading should be turned off since Fluent only uses physical CPU cores, there is a performance increase of 12.8 % when using HT, however, the main reason to leave HT on is if you want to do something on your pc during the simulation. If HT is off you are going to run the simulation on 3 cores, but if HT is on you can run it on 7 (since Windows will take advantage of the HT and you will have the same performance as with 1 real core) with increase of 22.6 % in simulation speed.
The overclocking aspect doesn't seem to have much effect on the Fluent speed, the increase in CPU clock speed of ~33 % gained about 3.5 % increase in simulation speed. The increase in electric power usage of 12 % (cpu only) hardly makes this worth the effort, especially when you factor in that at 4.5 GHz the cooling system was running at maximum settings (3/3) and at stock speed 1/3 setting was more than enough to keep the temperature levels same.
The FX8150 is slower per physical core, but since you do have 8 of them it is around 11-15 % faster than the i7-2600k. This all holds if you're not paying the licenses for Fluent yourself, if you are than the price of license cannot justify the slower per core performance of the AMD and you'd be better off getting two i5-2500k's since they'll scale linearly up to 4 nodes even on regular GigE ethernet.

This corrects my previous statements from the other thread (I've had apps using the CPU power from the i7 during tests which slowed it down quite a bit), the FX8150 doesn't really have a 25 % advantage over the i7. It's more along the lines of 12-13 % in realistic scenarios.
ghost82, bluebase and moud like this.
scipy is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 7, 2015, 13:26
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Dongyue Li
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Torino, Italy
Posts: 742
Rep Power: 9
sharonyue is on a distinguished road
The overclocking aspect doesn't seem to have much effect on the Fluent speed, the increase in CPU clock speed of ~33 % gained about 3.5 % increase in simulation speed.

This looks interesting!!!
sharonyue is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
solving a conduction problem in FLUENT using UDF Avin2407 Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming 1 March 13, 2015 03:02
Superlinear speedup in OpenFOAM 13 msrinath80 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 18 March 3, 2015 06:36
OpenFOAM 13 AMD quadcore parallel results msrinath80 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 1 November 11, 2007 00:23
AMD X2 & INTEL core 2 are compatible for parallel? nikolas FLUENT 0 October 5, 2006 06:49
Performance of dual core AMD processors Imraan Parker FLUENT 1 September 9, 2005 08:04


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:23.