|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Hi
,It's been wondered, which industry has the best CFD engineers/people? Oil & gas, automotive, construction, aerospace, f1, marine, energy, etc? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 638
Rep Power: 10 ![]() |
I'm not sure whether you can say, a CFD engineer from aerospace industry is better than one from oil & gas, one from marine or one from a F1 team.
Somebody running airfoil simulations for 10 years could be surprised about the complexity of a F1 car (I did both, but not for 10 years. What a shame, or should I say fortunately? I've got mixed feelings), although both is kind of external aerodynamics. This guy, how good he ever might be, might still have no idea of running a eulerian multiphase flow case or might get overchallenged running a case involving morphed meshes, lot of macro programming, boiling, CHT....Generally I would say, F1, aerospace industry etc. have a lot of specialized people, outstanding in what they do. Most guys working for an engineering service will not have the same expertise in any of this subjects, but will be more flexible when they get a case they have never seen before. Of course this assumes, engineering service people will not work for the same industry all the time, so it will be only partially right. CFD can be complex enough for never get boring. Sometimes a newbie will tell an old hand what to do. And even when you've got good expertise and 250 years experience, you will learn something new for sure. That's why I love it. But I don't care who is "better" than anyone else. (But to finish this post: I'm kind of jealous of some guys from F1 or aerospace for the computational ressources they've got available. I also want to have a cluster with 5000 CPU's....) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
kinda brings to what defines best or better or good
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Zachariah Swetky
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 36
Rep Power: 3 ![]() |
My opinion is that the aerospace industry probably has the most capable CFD workforce. My rationale is as follows:
1. Aerospace covers nearly every disciple in CFD (combustion, internal aero, external aero, multiphase, plasmadynamics, etc.) 2. The aerospace industry pushes the bounds of science to achieve the latest and greatest. Not to say that no one else does, I am merely saying that historically, aerospace is at the forefront of fluid dynamics in general. 3. The stuff flies. That in and of itself is awesome. However, there are very talented folks in every industry using CFD. We all push the bounds to achieve our goals. I am looking forward to hearing about why the other industries may be better than aerospace.
Last edited by swetkyz; November 16, 2011 at 13:07. Reason: Punctuation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 638
Rep Power: 10 ![]() |
swetkyz, of all transportation, I like planes the best. And you're somehow right. But only somehow. There are pretty much examples why a specific industry can have a hard job to do. I think, "best" guys are at some consultant companies. Not due to the extremely complicated physics and the most complex cases. But just 'cause a consultant doing every few weeks something completely different has to be very flexible. There's not much experience one could use from a similar case, but needs to get a good result in a tight time frame with limited resources.
An engineer doing external aero will most likely not do any combustion since engines are developed by different companies. There are not that much moving meshes involved. The time frame for development is not as tight as it is in Formula 1 (it's very stressful there). There are a lot of examples why other industry more deserves the good reputation of the aerospace industry. But all depends on the definition of "good", "better", "best", "worst" etc. It does neither make an automotive CFD engineer worse just since an aerospace CFD engineer does his job well since 5 years, nor vice versa. And not to forget: Even when some guys are in some industry which isn't that famous (who cares about electronic cooling? Just boring . The same with food technologies ...), it might be an important job they're doing - and they have to do it well, I'm sure!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 638
Rep Power: 10 ![]() |
But the most important thing is:
We are all CFD engineers. We are the best and we can rule the world, but we are modest enough not to shout it from the rooftops ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| CFD in Automotive industry | John Fields | Main CFD Forum | 1 | November 13, 2003 13:35 |
| CFD salary | dan collen | Main CFD Forum | 5 | August 22, 2001 09:56 |
| CFD JOBS and Expected Salary.... | Noel Harrison | Main CFD Forum | 11 | November 22, 2000 07:15 |
| Which is better to develop in-house CFD code or to buy a available CFD package. | Tareq Al-shaalan | Main CFD Forum | 10 | June 12, 1999 23:27 |
| CFD Symposium (Call for Papers) | Chris R. Kleijn | Main CFD Forum | 0 | October 5, 1998 10:25 |