
[Sponsors] 
Why we normally provide velocity at inlet and pressure at outlet for pipe flow? 

LinkBack  Thread Tools  Display Modes 
April 30, 2012, 08:18 
Why we normally provide velocity at inlet and pressure at outlet for pipe flow?

#1 
New Member
PARESH GUJARATI
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 5 
Hello,
Why we normally provide velocity at inlet and pressure at outlet for pipe flow? In FLUENT, We need to provide boundary condition like velocity inlet and pressure outlet. When we provide velocity inlet value, where this velocity value will be used to calculate flow field? What is the use of pressure outlet information at outlet condition? which equations will use these values at inlet and outlet? Sorry for asking simple question but I am having doubt so. Please answer it. 

April 30, 2012, 11:24 

#2 
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 5 
The choice of variables at inlet/outlet boundary conditions is in fact not unique. However, you have to ensure that information which enters the domain at the boundary is given by a proper choice of variables at the boundary.
For example for the 1D compressible Euler equations, you have 3 characteristic waves in the fluid  a sound wave traveling to the left (at speed uc), a sound wave traveling to the right (at speed u+c) and an entropy wave (convection at speed u). At the boundaries you have to distinguish four different cases:  subsonic inlet: 2 characteristics enter the domain (u, u+c), 1 characteristic leaves the domain (uc)  subsonic outlet: 1 characteristic enters the domain (uc), 2 characteristics leave the domain (u, u+c)  supersonic inlet: all 3 characteristics enter the domain (u, u+c, uc)  supersonic outlet: all 3 characteristics leave the domain (u, u+c, uc), no further boundary information is necessary For a boundary condition to be wellposed you have to provide the information that fully determines the characteristic waves which _enter_ the domain. This information is needed to solve the fluid field, i.e. to determine the fluxes through the boundary interfaces. The other characteristic waves leaving the domain can be determined from the values within the domain. For example, for a subsonic inlet, the sound and entropy waves entering the domain are fully determined if _one_ of the following pairs of variables are given at the boundary: (density,energy) or (density,velocity) or (pressure, mass flux) For a subsonic outlet, the sound wave entering the domain can be determined by _one_ of the following variables at the outlet: pressure,velocity,mass flux,temperature,enthalpy The best choice of variables depends on your problem. Good references for further reading are the book by Hirsch "Numerical computation of internal and external flow. Volume 2" or the paper by JeanMichel Ghidaglia "The normal flux method at the boundary for multidimensional finite volume approximations in CFD" (European Journal of Mechanics  B/Fluids, Vol. 24/1, 2005) 

April 30, 2012, 11:57 

#3 
Member
Jonas T. Holdeman, Jr.
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Knoxville, Tennessee
Posts: 96
Rep Power: 9 
That is a good question. There may be mathematical, computational, and physical reasons. From notions of causality, one might expect that some sort of entrance boundary conditions might be necessary to "prepare" the flow for the region of interest. And this might be necessary for the algorithm one is using.
Incompressible flow is a little strange. For an incompressible fluid in a rigid container, any perturbation of the flow at one point is instantly felt everywhere in the fluid. The state of flow is everywhere consistent. In such a case, inlet and outlet boundary conditions may not be necessary. This is the case if strictly divergencefree finite elements are used in the FEM. There one can use "do nothing" boundary conditions, where inlet and outlet B.C. are not specified. Considering Poiseulle (socalled pressuredriven) flow in a straight channel for example, one can simulate developed flow with just a few elements along the channel and no in or out BCs. One can match the known velocity profile (parabolic in 2D) at the center of the channel as accurately as the crosschannel resolution will allow, while the error at the entrance and exit will be at most a few percent. The NavierStokes equation is a composite equation, being the sum of a pressureless velocitygoverning equation and an equation for the pressure as a functional of the velocity. This result follows from the Helmholtz decomposition theorem. In this view, no pressure BC is needed (other than specifying the pressure at one point) because the velocity doesn't depend on the pressure. Now if one does not use strictly divergencefree functions in a primative variable formulation, then one must use some sort of projection to remove the nonsolenoidal component of the approximation. Unfortunately the pressure is often confused with this projected term (they both satisfy the same equation but different BC). The confusion is that when people talk about BC on the "pressure", they are really talking about the projection. 

August 3, 2012, 05:53 
velocity inlet in fluent

#4 
Senior Member
kumar
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 115
Rep Power: 5 
Dear friends,
In fluent, For analysis of 2D naca0012 airfoil velocity inlet we give vcostheta in x component & vsintheta in y component, v is inlet velocity. 1)here i start analysis of 3D wing, for that i take naca 0012 airfoil & extrude 100mm, in gambit and analysis in fluent i have doubt how to set velocity inlet, here i consider my velocity is 50m/s, then what is xyz component,please let me know. 2)if you consider 3D wing, (vtantheta for z component) is correct or wrong, please let me know. 2) how to find angle of attack for 3D wing? please let me know 

Tags 
pressure outlet, velocity inlet 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Pressure Inlet VS velocity Inlet difference  Mohsin  FLUENT  6  January 15, 2015 18:15 
Mass flow inlet and pressure outlet issue  nikhil  FLUENT  5  December 11, 2013 13:30 
Neumann pressure BC and velocity field  Antech  Main CFD Forum  0  April 25, 2006 02:15 
Terrible Mistake In Fluid Dynamics History  Abhi  Main CFD Forum  12  July 8, 2002 09:11 
what the result is negatif pressure at inlet  chong chee nan  FLUENT  0  December 29, 2001 06:13 