|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
> What would you suggest for appropriate boundary-conditions where wave
: phenomena show themselves? Perhaps the simplest reasonable ones are those of Thompson (J. Comp. Phys. late 80s) but the subject has received a lot of attention during the 90s as CAA and general purpose compressible flow developed. > Do commercial solvers allow such boundary-conditions? I do not have direct experience but several of the fruitful areas like unsteady flow in compressor/turbine blading will require it and so I expect the answer is yes. |
|
|
||
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello again! I overcame this problem that I had and everything is going perfectly. Thank you very much for your advice. I implemented my code for moving walls also and for pressure boundary conditions and it converges and the results are fine (without any scock-like regions). The problem was at the differencing scheme that I am using (hybrid).I did not include the temp div(u) in the Ap coefficient.What a silly thing to do... Nevermind...
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Well done... Good luck with your future research...
![]() diaw... |
|
|
||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WAVE Ricardo Software | CED | Main CFD Forum | 42 | March 26, 2010 03:57 |
| Noise and Turbulence | Matthias | Main CFD Forum | 9 | May 11, 2001 04:38 |