|May 5, 2012, 08:14||
why omega instead of epsilon in turbulence modeling
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1Rep Power: 0
I have a very basic doubt. Why there is a need to write the equation of omega instead of epsilon in turbulence modeling. Are there any advantages of omega equation which cannot be incorporated in epsilon equation.
|May 5, 2012, 11:02||
Join Date: Mar 2009
Blog Entries: 17Rep Power: 19
When you write the epsilon equation in terms of omega you get an equation which is different from the wilcox omega equation, due to the elimination of a term (proportional to grad_omega * grad_k). In the SST formulation of the k-omega model this term is not eliminated but dumped to the walls.
This additional term, which is the only difference among the two and justifies the generally better results for the SST model, is not explicitly visible in the epsilon equation, hence the choice. In theory, an equivalent term could be subtracted from the epsilon equation but this term would imply the gradient of an epsilon/k function which is much more cumbersome to discretize (besides the accuracy issues).
I am not aware of any other reason, still there could be additional ones
Last edited by sbaffini; May 5, 2012 at 11:09. Reason: Accidentally pushed the quick reply button
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Turbulence postprocessing||Mohsin||FLUENT||2||October 3, 2016 14:18|
|Bounding epsilon or bounding omega||Stylianos||OpenFOAM||6||September 21, 2016 04:52|
|SST K- omega turbulence model||mb.pejvak||Main CFD Forum||8||September 16, 2011 08:52|
|CFD-Wiki Monthly Focus Area: Turbulence Modeling||Jonas Larsson||Main CFD Forum||0||May 6, 2006 19:08|
|turbulence modeling questions||llowen||Main CFD Forum||3||September 11, 1998 04:24|