CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Extreme WIG simulation-reality results divergence

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   May 7, 2012, 07:44
Default Extreme WIG simulation-reality results divergence
  #1
New Member
 
Jake Billingham
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 5
Jeb51 is on a distinguished road
Hello everyone,
I've been doing a project on modelling the Ground Effect with a NACA0012 aerofoil for my final year and have found that at a h/c value of 0.1 the numbers simply don't make sense. Between 1.0 and 0.2 they match the experimentally established values well but at 0.1 things go horribly wrong. I've checked my boundary conditions and they're the same as all the others and I can't explain why this has occurred.

Here are the numbers from 0.2:
Angle of attack: 4 degrees
Lift: 113.31N
Drag: 17.71N
Cl: 0.43525
Cd: 0.06803

h/c = 0.1
Angle of attack: 4 degrees
Lift: -22891.56N
Drag: -239.04
Cl: -87.9323
Cd: -0.918214

Does anyone know anything that might be able to explain what's happened here?

Thanks,
Jake

Last edited by Jeb51; May 7, 2012 at 08:03.
Jeb51 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 9, 2012, 06:01
Default
  #2
Member
 
alireza
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 7
alireza_b is an unknown quantity at this point
Hello
when h/c=0.1, (extreme ground effect) negative lift can be found.
if you increases your angle of attack, you will see positive lift.
albeit:
in many of papers reported different data.for example positive lift in Ahmed paper and negative lift in moore papre. (for symmetrical airfoil)
alireza_b is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 9, 2012, 06:48
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Jake Billingham
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 5
Jeb51 is on a distinguished road
The issue here isn't that it's negative, I expected that from looking at published data. The problem is the magnitude of it. I'm getting aerodynamic efficiencies of 90 upwards. I can't explain how the simulation has diverged so far from the expected values as given by the material I'm comparing to.
Jeb51 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Quarter Burner mesh with periosic condition SamCanuck FLUENT 2 August 31, 2011 11:34
Comparison of 2D simulation results with 3D Mohit Gupta Main CFD Forum 0 September 29, 2008 13:04
comparison of CFD results with reality chouer CFX 0 October 31, 2005 14:30
Gravity g's influence on Simulation Results Colin Main CFD Forum 6 November 2, 2003 15:13
graphical handling of simulation results yf yap Main CFD Forum 3 February 12, 2001 20:35


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:17.