CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

New to FEM, quesiton on theory

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   November 8, 2005, 14:03
Default New to FEM, quesiton on theory
  #1
Lucas
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I was wondering if it is necessary in FEM to reduce the derivatives from 2 to 1 through integration by parts or the Green-Gauss theorem. If quadratic shape functions are used that have defined 2nd derivatives, could they not be used directly rather than reducing the order of derivative and then substituting? Any references would also be appreciated.
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 8, 2005, 22:47
Default Re: New to FEM, quesiton on theory
  #2
Praveen. C
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The purpose of performing integration by parts is not so much to reduce the order of derivatives but to put the problem in a form where the Lax-Milgram lemma can be used. See

S. Larson, V. Thomee. Partial Differential Equations with Numerical Methods. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 2003
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 8, 2005, 23:22
Default Re: New to FEM, quesiton on theory
  #3
diaw
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The use of 'integration by parts', especially in the momentum equations, allows the inclusion of boundary-conditions in a direct way.

diaw...
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 9, 2005, 18:10
Default Re: New to FEM, quesiton on theory
  #4
Sharif
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
It also simplifies mapping elemental regions onto a reference element (allowing operations to be carried out at the element level). Having to transform derivetive terms becomes ugly and costly pretty fast as the order of the derivatives increase.

This to me seems more important than making it possible to prove something.

Sharif
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 10, 2005, 16:46
Default Re: New to FEM, quesiton on theory
  #5
Lucas
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thanks for all of the input. The reference was checked out of my library, but I am researching the Lax-Milgram lemma. I am also looking into transforming the derivatives from global terms to element terms. Basically, I am going to be looking at systems in which the boundary is open. I am hoping to find a way to apply the FEM.
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I developed an FEM toolkit in Java: FuturEye nkliuyueming Main CFD Forum 6 August 3, 2012 05:26
comments on FDM, FEM, FVM, SM, SEM, DSEM, BEM kenn Main CFD Forum 2 July 18, 2004 18:28
The reasons why FEM has more computational quantit Liu Main CFD Forum 0 June 20, 2004 22:00
FEM (LSFEM vs GLS FEM vs Penalty) for Stokes equ. Gerhard Main CFD Forum 2 March 10, 2004 11:45
FEM or FVM for CFD Astrid Main CFD Forum 18 December 15, 2000 00:02


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:17.