# A simple question

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 November 15, 2005, 09:30 A simple question #1 Q Guest   Posts: n/a We all know that in k-epsilon model of turbulence the turbulent viscosity is calculated using the follwing expression given by launder and jones nu_t=c_mu*(k*k/epsilon) can anyone of you guys please tell me how did he come to this expression for calculating the turbulent viscosity

 November 15, 2005, 23:45 Re: A simple question #2 Harry Fulmer Guest   Posts: n/a Somewhere along the line it was realized that the turbulent viscosity had to be based on a length scale multiplied by a velocity scale. k is a velocity scale, k/e is a length scale. As to why these properties were chosen... I've no idea but would like to find out as well

 November 16, 2005, 02:57 Re: A simple question #3 D.Pavitran Guest   Posts: n/a Hi, The dimensions of turbulent viscosity is same as that of kinematic viscosity(m2/s). Since for an eddy we have a velocity and length scale available. We get correct dimensions for turbulent viscosity if the length and velocity scales are multiplied. turbulent viscosity proportional to U * l This is reasonable, because it is these scales which are responsible for most of the transport by turbulent diffusion. The turbulent length scale is taken as the square root of turbulent kinetic energy k(m2/s2) , i.e turbulent viscosity proportional to sqrt(k) * l for finding k a transport equation will be used . We could also use a transport equation for the turbulent length scale l, but it has been found that it is better to solve an equation for the dissipation epsilon (epsilon= u*u*u/l) . Thus we want to express turbulent viscosity in k and epsilon, i.e turbulent viscosity = cmu*kaεb ( a and b are the respective powers) a and b are determined by dimensional analysis. turbulent viscosity= m2/s k= m2/s2 ε= m2/s3. thus the values of a=2 and b= -1 so, turbulent viscosity = cmu*k2/ε . regards/ Pavitran D

 November 16, 2005, 04:37 Re: A simple question #4 Q Guest   Posts: n/a Dear Pavitran but do you really think this is based upon dimensional analysis(did you read it somewhere) Can you give me the refernces. Q

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post m.nichols19 OpenFOAM 3 June 25, 2010 01:44 Atella CFX 3 April 11, 2010 06:44 Atella Main CFD Forum 0 April 9, 2010 10:58 universez Main CFD Forum 0 November 18, 2009 21:12 RC FLUENT 2 March 25, 2004 06:30

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:07.