|June 8, 2012, 20:16||
Cf over flat plate obtained by SST k-omega
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 130Rep Power: 7
I applied SST k-omega turbulence model on the code, I could simulate steady, incompressible turbulent flow past over Two-dimensional zero-pressure-gradient flat plate. first of all I should mention some details about grid. computations were performed on a grids of size 273×193. dimension of domains are −0.33333 < x < 2 and 0 < y < 1. grid spacing (wall normal direction) was 1 × 10−6.
according to my results for Re=2e6 and comparison with theoretical formula used for Cf (Skin Friction coefficient, Cf= 0.025Re exp(-1/7)), you can see in attached file result is not very good. but in U+-Log Y+ results is good I think based on numerical result that other obtained (Rumsey and Spalart) specially in sublayer.
So my question is why in sublayer U+ profile is completely match with theoretical profile but cf is not? and do you think what problem exist?
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|k-omega-SST model (OF 1.6) - turbulent flat plate||cboss||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||24||February 24, 2016 04:52|
|Boundary Conditions for k omega SST||dancfd||OpenFOAM Pre-Processing||0||June 9, 2011 23:25|
|Flow Over a Flat Plate||recon9||CFX||1||January 20, 2011 22:09|
|Calculate Drag force for flat plate||vsun||FLUENT||0||October 3, 2010 07:56|
|flat plate transition: SST k-omega divergence||Peter Gasparovic||FLUENT||4||May 3, 2005 13:54|