# assumption of invisid flow

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 November 21, 2005, 11:10 assumption of invisid flow #1 Lam Guest   Posts: n/a i read an stament, "the inviscid assumption is valid if the time scales for diffusion are much larger compared to the time scales for convection" i didn't get what it say, anybody can give me an explaination? Thank you.

 November 21, 2005, 12:36 Re: assumption of invisid flow #2 ganesh Guest   Posts: n/a Dear Lam, No practical flow is inviscid, because all fluids possess some finite viscodity, however small. It would therfore be questionable as to why we focus so much on euler flows, which do not consider viscosity and are far from practice. It is here that the inviscid assumption must be looked at in the context described in your question. If the time scales for diffusion are larger than for convection, then this means that any quantity would be convected faster than it is diffused, so that the effect of diffusion can be neglected though it exists. Translated into non-dimensional terms it would imply that the Reynolds's number is huge. Truly, larger the Re, more valid the assumption, since Re is infinite for a truly inviscid flow. It must be noted that it is for this reason that Euler codes are handy, because if you are interested in the pressure distribution of a practical turbulent flow past a configuration, we could get this easily from an Euler code and the solution will be very close to what a turbulent code would have predicited. The utility of a turbulent solver would come in if the drag on the configuration is sought( The boundar layer effect is captured in the turbulent solver). It is also worth considering the fact that the inviscid Burger's equation( similar to Euler equation) can be seen to be the vanishing viscosity limit of the viscous Burgers equation( similar to the N/S equation). The explanation to your question therefore is that larger time scales for diffusion would mean that the flow would not experience the diffusive action compared to the convection and it would be as if the flow did not experience any diffusion inspite of having viscosity. This assumption is one of the key-componenets in Prandtl-Batchelor theorem. Hope this helps. Regards, Ganesh

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post goodegg Main CFD Forum 12 January 22, 2013 12:47 CD adapco Group Marketing CD-adapco 3 June 21, 2011 08:33 diaw Main CFD Forum 105 November 20, 2009 05:19 ib FLUENT 1 March 26, 2007 13:11 stanley FLUENT 1 February 2, 2007 07:44

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:56.