CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Teta term in Menter's Momentum thickness Reynolds number equation for transition

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   June 28, 2012, 18:56
Default Teta term in Menter's Momentum thickness Reynolds number equation for transition
  #1
New Member
 
Adrian
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 5
Adrian281 is on a distinguished road
Hi, I'm currently undertaking a task of implementing the gamma-Re transition formulation for turbulence modelling by way of a UDF in Fluent.
I've come across a problem.
There's lambda term in used for prediction of transition onset, denoted lambda underscore theta. In the formulation of this term, a parameter given by a capital theta is required. (equation 28 in Langtry & Menter, 2009, 'Correlation-based transition modelling for unstructured parallelized computations CFD')
The problem is, that in all the literature I have looked in, no correlation or formulation for this term is given.
As you would expect, this has brough my progress to a standstill.
I would be grateful if anyone could suggest where I might be able to look for an answer.
Many thanks.
Adrian281 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 28, 2012, 20:09
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Mehdi
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Iran
Posts: 130
Rep Power: 6
mb.pejvak is on a distinguished road
it should be calculated iteratively. you should take following step:
1-guess teta (teta=0)
2-find F(lateta) and Rethetat (from form. 35-38)
3-find theta from Retheta (Retheta=ru*theta*U/mu - you can see it in Nomenclature)
4-go to step 2 and iterate until it converge.

I hope I can explain it well.
__________________
Best Regards;
Mehdi
E-mail: mb.pejvak[at]Gmail[dot]com
mb.pejvak is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 29, 2012, 09:53
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Adrian
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 5
Adrian281 is on a distinguished road
That makes it much clearer. Thanks very much.
Adrian281 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 29, 2012, 10:02
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Adrian
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 5
Adrian281 is on a distinguished road
Just one thing, to calculate theta in step three, which value for Retheta do I use? Do I make it equal to Rethetat?
Adrian281 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 29, 2012, 12:10
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Mehdi
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Iran
Posts: 130
Rep Power: 6
mb.pejvak is on a distinguished road
I am sorry, i made a mistake. In fact, Rethetat is true in step three instead of Retheta.
__________________
Best Regards;
Mehdi
E-mail: mb.pejvak[at]Gmail[dot]com
mb.pejvak is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 29, 2012, 12:35
Default
  #6
New Member
 
Adrian
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 5
Adrian281 is on a distinguished road
But then Rethetat is calculated using thetat, whereas lambdatheta is calculated using just theta.
Adrian281 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 29, 2012, 22:35
Default
  #7
Senior Member
 
Mehdi
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Iran
Posts: 130
Rep Power: 6
mb.pejvak is on a distinguished road
yes that is true, but in calculation of landa it was recommended to Theta= thatat. In fact, I have never understand why and in all paper and thesis I have read, never describe its reason.
if I complete my former reply, following steps can explain it better:

(a) guess the initial value for Thetat (=0 was recommended)
(b) calculate the Landa by setting Theta= thatat
(c) calculate the Flanda
(d) calculate the Rethetat
(e) calculate the t from the definition of Thetat =(no/U)Ret.
(f) go to step 2 and iterate until it converge.
The calculation may converge in a few iterations.
__________________
Best Regards;
Mehdi
E-mail: mb.pejvak[at]Gmail[dot]com

Last edited by mb.pejvak; June 30, 2012 at 01:11.
mb.pejvak is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 1, 2012, 12:31
Default
  #8
New Member
 
Adrian
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 5
Adrian281 is on a distinguished road
I'll try that out. Many thanks for your help.
Adrian281 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 14, 2012, 15:29
Default
  #9
New Member
 
Adrian
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 5
Adrian281 is on a distinguished road
A friend of mine is also implementing the Transition formulation of Menter for the Spalart Allmaras turbulence model based on the paper by Medida and Baeder 'Application of the Correlation based gamma-retet Transition Model to the Spalart-Allmaras Turbulence model' and has encountered a problem with the blending function.
In the paper it is specified that the blending function is used to distinguish a wall boundary layer and a free shear layer to deactivate the production term in the wall boundary layer only. However, this function depends on the dissipation rate, which is not available in the S-A model. The paper says that the blending function has been turned off manually, but does not explicitly specify how this is done.
Can anyone suggest how this is done? Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Adrian281 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 30, 2012, 20:30
Default
  #10
New Member
 
patty
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 6
TedBrogan is on a distinguished road
Adrian,

I am trying to put in the SA transition model currently also. I ran into the same problem with how to handle the F_theta blending function. Do you know how your friend ended up resolving that?
TedBrogan is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
menter, omega, sst, transition

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cell Reynolds Number laliong Main CFD Forum 11 March 19, 2015 12:42
No layers in a small gap bobburnquist OpenFOAM Native Meshers: snappyHexMesh and Others 2 November 25, 2012 09:54
Constant velocity of the material Sas CFX 15 July 13, 2010 08:56
how to integrate this x momentum equation term Prakash Main CFD Forum 0 June 13, 2008 10:45


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:41.