CFD Online Discussion Forums (http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/)
-   Main CFD Forum (http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/main/)
-   -   Shear Strain Rate (http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/main/105454-shear-strain-rate.html)

 Dave442 July 31, 2012 10:06

Shear Strain Rate

Hi all,

I have been reading about non-Newtonian fluids recently and I have a question about the scalar shear strain rate. In the Ansys CFX theory manual, the scalar shear strain rate is defined as follows:

gamma = [2*(delUi/delXj : Dij)]^0.5

Here, the tensor Dij denotes the strain rate (or rate of deformation) tensor. In the Ansys Fluent theory manual, the scalar shear strain rate is then defined as follows:

gamma = [0.5*(Dij : Dij)]^0.5

Finally, in two journal publications that I have found, the scalar shear strain rate is alternately defined as follows:

gamma = [(Dij : Dij)]^0.5
gamma = [2*(Dij : Dij)]^0.5

Why are there so many different definitions for the scalar shear strain rate? Any insight would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Dave

 Dave442 August 1, 2012 07:29

So I think I may have figured this out.

The rate of deformation (or strain rate) tensor is typically defined as follows:

Dij=0.5*(delUi/delXj+delUj/delXi)

In the Ansys Fluent theory manual the 0.5 is neglected in this definition which leads to the following definition of the scalar shear strain rate:

gamma = [0.5*(Dij : Dij)]^0.5

Including the 0.5 in the definition of the rate of deformation tensor leads to the following definition of the scalar shear strain rate:

gamma = [2*(Dij : Dij)]^0.5

Finally, the definition of the scalar shear strain rate given in the Ansys CFX theory which reads as follows:

gamma = [2*(delUi/delXj : Dij)]^0.5

leads to the same equation as the above definitions. So thats three out of four definitions accounted for. Still not sure of the last one.

Cant understand Why the 0.5 would be left out of the definition for the rate of deformation tensor though.

Any ideas?
Dave

 cfd_begin October 24, 2013 09:08

Hi, Dave.
Using tensor, you can easily prove that:
gamma = [2*(delUi/delXj : Dij)]^0.5

is SAME as
gamma = [2*(Dij : Dij)]^0.5

Therefore, for CFX
We can write:
sstrnr=gamma = [2*(Dij : Dij)]^0.5

To Prove:
write Dij in Matrix form as 3 by 3 Matrix. Multiply Dij by Dij using Matrix multiplication.
Sum up the diagonal elements of the Result Matrix and Multiply by 2.

After Manipulation, you will get the same result for sstrnr as ANSYS CFX Manual.

 Dave442 October 24, 2013 10:20

Hi cfd_begin,

I understand that [2*(delUi/delXj : Dij)]^0.5 = [2*(Dij : Dij)]^0.5.

My problem was the definitions of the scalar shear strain rate in ANSYS CFX and ANSYS Fluent are slightly different:

In CFX Theory Manual: gamma = [2*(delUi/delXj : Dij)]^0.5 = [2*(Dij : Dij)]^0.5

In Fluent User Manual: gamma = [0.5*(Dij : Dij)]^0.5

I believe this is because:

In CFX Theory Manual: Dij = 0.5*(delUi/delXj+delUj/delXi)

In Fluent User Manual: Dij = (delUi/delXj+delUj/delXi)

As I said before, I'm not sure why the 0.5 would is left out of the rate of deformation tensor.

Kind Regards,
Dave

 cfd_begin October 24, 2013 22:19

Hi Dave,

I think that the deformation tensor Dij is defined for compatibility with the definition of gamma.

In CFX Theory Manual: gamma = [2*(delUi/delXj : Dij)]^0.5 = [2*(Dij : Dij)]^0.5

In Fluent User Manual: gamma = [0.5*(Dij : Dij)]^0.5
Its just my opinion !

 Dave442 October 25, 2013 04:08

Hi cfd_begin,

In all of the continuum mechanics books that I have read, the rate of deformation tensor is defined as 0.5*(delUi/delXj+delUj/delXi).

I'm sure that there is probably a very good reason for dropping the 0.5 in ANSYS Fluent. I just never figured it out.

I can't imagine that a different definition of Dij would be used just to satisfy a different definition of gamma? Why not use conventional definitions?

Kind Regards,
Dave

 All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:32.