Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 July 21, 1999, 12:51 steady and unsteady flow #1 shisheng Guest   Posts: n/a Hi, experts if the flow physices is unsteady, can I use the steady method (code) to simulate this flow problem? if not, what is the wrong? or the simulation is not convegent or the simulation results are false? Best wishes!

 July 21, 1999, 16:31 Re: steady and unsteady flow #2 clifford bradford Guest   Posts: n/a you can simulate anything you want, the computer doesn't care (and you might have convergence and all that) but as for you results - they'll be as trustworthy as a politician. you can modify steady codes to make them unsteady and some codes can do both but if the flow is unsteady the code must be as well. be sensible and don't cut corners

 July 21, 1999, 17:06 Re: steady and unsteady flow #4 Hongjun Li Guest   Posts: n/a It depends on the numerical schemes. Some schemes are good for both steady and unsteady solutions but most of them are not. Many schemes were developed to get final steady solutions and do not care HOW to get there, so there are many 'acceleration methods' to speed up convergence rate. (for example, local time step, pre-conditioning, relaxation, enthalpy damping, etc.). The intermidiate solutions (not converged solutions) have no physical meanings at all. Only the final converged solutions are physically meaningful. In another word, the destination is right but the path is a short-cut. Those schemes can not be used for unsteady flow calculations.

 July 22, 1999, 06:10 thnak you, but don't understand #5 shisheng Guest   Posts: n/a Hi, all, thank you for your contributions. I mean if the flow physices is unsteady, for example, flow around a cylinde, Reynolds number is about in the transient regime, can we us the code for steady state (without time derivative item) to get the solution ? (naturally steady solution), but the flow phsices is unsteady, if we can get the numerical solution? is this solution phsically meaningful? Best regards

 July 22, 1999, 10:06 Re: thnak you, but don't understand #6 John C. Chien Guest   Posts: n/a (1). As I said, there is no direct relationship between the numerical solution and the real flow, unless the flow is properly modelled. (2). You really have some difficulties in describing your problem. For flow over a cylinder, as the Reynolds number is increased to a certain range, the flow in the wake region will become unsteady. That is the physics, the real flow problem. (3). On the other hand, if you obtain a solution to the steady-state equation at the same Reynolds number, it is still all right because you are solving a mathematical problem. This has nothing to do with the real problem at all. The same is true, if you obtain a solution to the steady-state Euler equation, the solution will be inviscid solution and steady. In the real world, there is no steady-state, inviscid problem or solutions. (4). So, the key issue here is the "proper modeling" and the " proper interpretation" of the "CFD model" and the "CFD solutions". That is one has to make a "proper connection before and after performing CFD analysis". (5). In other word, steady and symmetric solution to the Navier-Stokes equations at a high Reynolds number for flow over a cylinder is just a mathematical solution. Without the "modeling" and "interpretation" stages, the solution has no physical meaning at all.

 July 22, 1999, 13:01 Re: steady code for unsteady flow, don't understand. #8 shisheng Guest   Posts: n/a thnak you John and Patrick, thank you both for the suggestion, because I want to know the relationship between the numerical solution and the real flow physices. if my geometries are complex, at low Reynolds number the flow is perhaps steady, but when the Reynolds number is increased step by step, the flow changs from steady to unsteady (or periodic), I don't know at which Reynolds number this change will happen, so I want to know if at a Reynoldy number I can get not only steady solution, but also unsteady solution. But I don't know which solution is real solution. steaty or unsteady? which is the real solution? Beat regards

 July 22, 1999, 20:17 Re: steady and unsteady flow #10 Jason Wang Guest   Posts: n/a I think there some methods to solve this kind of problems. not very difficult.

 July 23, 1999, 06:00 Re: steady code for unsteady flow, don't understand. #11 Alexey Guest   Posts: n/a In this case you MUST use unsteady methods only. It is obviously. The relationship between the numerical solution and the real flow physices is the approximation error like this const1*(space_grid_step)**nspace + const2*(time_step)**ntime , where nspace and ntime are orders of accurcy of your numerical scheme in space and time, respectively. Usually, steady methods treat the time step as an iteration parameter which may be very big. Becouse the time approximation error is big too.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Mohsin FLUENT 6 October 9, 2014 05:30 siva appanna Main CFD Forum 3 February 20, 2006 06:29 Muhammad Shakaib FLUENT 1 December 7, 2005 13:58 Dominique FLUENT 5 April 16, 2004 17:58 winnie FLUENT 1 April 28, 2003 11:30

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:53.