CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

The boundary layer thickness on an airfoil

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree2Likes
  • 2 Post By truffaldino

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   September 13, 2012, 02:18
Default The boundary layer thickness on an airfoil
  #1
Senior Member
 
Nick
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 110
Rep Power: 5
Nick R is on a distinguished road
Hey guys,


I know that on a flat plate the boundary layer thickness is the thickness where streamwise velocity reaches 99% of the freestream speed. How does this work on an airfoil since the flow speeds up above the foil and slows down beneath it? Do we still use 99% of the free-stream as the thickness ?

cheers,
Nick R
Nick R is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 13, 2012, 09:37
Default
  #2
MHP
Member
 
mhp
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 33
Rep Power: 4
MHP is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick R View Post
Hey guys,


I know that on a flat plate the boundary layer thickness is the thickness where streamwise velocity reaches 99% of the freestream speed. How does this work on an airfoil since the flow speeds up above the foil and slows down beneath it? Do we still use 99% of the free-stream as the thickness ?

cheers,
Nick R
Yes,of course.
No matter how much is your speed, whenever your speed in the perpendicular direction relative to the surface reaches 99% of the free stream,you can calculate BL thickness at that point.
MHP is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 13, 2012, 09:56
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
truffaldino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 209
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 7
truffaldino is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick R View Post
Hey guys,


I know that on a flat plate the boundary layer thickness is the thickness where streamwise velocity reaches 99% of the freestream speed. How does this work on an airfoil since the flow speeds up above the foil and slows down beneath it? Do we still use 99% of the free-stream as the thickness ?

cheers,
Nick R
Even on a flat plate one uses different notions of thikness for different purpoces. More meaningful (than 99%) notions of thikness are displacement thikness and momentum thikness. This depends on what for you need this thikness. If one wants to join inviscid solution far from airfoil with viscous bl solution it is necessary modify airfoil profile by displacement thikness. If one wants to find drag force, then it is defined by momentum thikness.
truffaldino is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 13, 2012, 20:22
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Nick
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 110
Rep Power: 5
Nick R is on a distinguished road
thanks it makes sense
Nick R is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 14, 2012, 03:50
Post
  #5
MHP
Member
 
mhp
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 33
Rep Power: 4
MHP is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by MHP View Post
Yes,of course.
No matter how much is your speed, whenever your speed in the perpendicular direction relative to the surface reaches 99% of the free stream,you can calculate BL thickness at that point.
As an additional note,please pay attention that in advanced BL references the pressure gradient over the geometry is another issue that enter in BL thickness calculations, we use 0.99% of free stream velocity for flat plate,because in that case the free velocity is constant over the plate and there is no pressure gradient, but for airfoil depending on the geometry profiles there is pressure gradients.
good luck.
MHP is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 23, 2013, 10:25
Default A nagging thought on thickness notions
  #6
New Member
 
Daniel
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 4
fadiga is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by truffaldino View Post
Even on a flat plate one uses different notions of thikness for different purpoces. More meaningful (than 99%) notions of thikness are displacement thikness and momentum thikness. This depends on what for you need this thikness. If one wants to join inviscid solution far from airfoil with viscous bl solution it is necessary modify airfoil profile by displacement thikness. If one wants to find drag force, then it is defined by momentum thikness.
I have to say, this "..there are more meaningful notions of thicknss.." talk is rather annoying. I have seen countless posts, also on other forums where this is stated!

IMO - Whichever notion you decide to go for, you need to define some sort of cut-off between your inner and outer flow, since even for the displacement and momentum thicknesses, you have to decide how much wall effects to incorporate...
fadiga is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
No layers in a small gap bobburnquist OpenFOAM Native Meshers: snappyHexMesh and Others 2 November 25, 2012 08:54
Boundary layer in a pipe Clementhuon OpenFOAM Native Meshers: snappyHexMesh and Others 6 March 12, 2012 13:41
Wall coordinates and boundary layer thickness bentmol Main CFD Forum 1 July 3, 2011 20:44
How to know the know the Boundary Layer thickness and the edge velocity on a 3D wing? mohammad Main CFD Forum 8 May 16, 2011 12:21
boundary layer thickness 98.4F Main CFD Forum 1 December 29, 2000 07:23


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:18.