CFD Online URL
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Negative Pressure

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   February 3, 2006, 00:38
Default Negative Pressure
  #1
Mohammad
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hello !!

Presently I involved in 2D Laminar Viscous Compressible flow computations. I validated the inviscid part of the code by several compressible benchmark problems. I am using Unstructured mesh FVM (cell centered) for my computations...

I am facing some serious problems for viscous computations..For external flow pbms (Airfoil).. I am making farfield boundary circle 40 chords away from the airfoil.. I am using Green-Gauss theorem for face gradient calculation. 1. Convergence Limiting problem.. While running the code.. I am facing Negative Pressure in a single control volume(not the same element always).. then convergence stops.. 2. For Flat plate case. i couldnt get exact no-slip (u!=0... u=0.02). i am using 0.01 size elements near flatplate.. 3. which is best? either FEM or FVM approach to calculate the face gradient for viscous part? and Why the CFD peoples are moving towards FEM for viscous part?

Please tell your views, good face gradient calculation approach, and about FEM for CFD? Thanks in Advance Yousuf

  Reply With Quote

Old   February 3, 2006, 03:52
Default Re: Negative Pressure
  #2
ganesh
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dear Mohammad,

If your code has been validated succesfully for the inviscid part, the failure of the code can be attributed to the viscous part. The following are my comments

1. In case of flat plate, the exact no-slip will never be obtained, in the sense that if you are looking at the cell away from the boundary and you have imposed the no-slip condition at the boundary. Away from the no-slip boundary where it is the case that u=v=0, exactly, for any point infinitesimally away there would definitely exist an infinitesimmaly small velocity. Have you been able to validate the flat plate case ? This would be one of the simplest problems to take up.

2. You could try your problem with a circular cylinder at M=0.1-0.2 and Re=40 , instead of an airfoil, although strictly there should be no difference in the performance of the code in either cases. The far field boundary is not an issue, as long as it is 10-12 chords (40 is too large, but good if you are using a freestream BC on the boundary, so that the Cl, Cd are grid-independent). Also check your farfield BC.

Are you using a first order scheme or a reconstruction procedure? Also, check the time step if you are using an explicit scheme. Even if the scheme is implicit, try reducing the CFL.

3. FEM and FVM are jsut discretisation procedures. The popularity of FVM in CFD is just because it was designed that way, and has the interesting property of conservation bulit into it by default. Visocus flux discretisation is truly an issue in itself, Green-Gauss procedure however should do the job, as it is reportedly robust inspite of being inconsistent on arbitrary polygonal meshes like the one you use.

Hope this helps Regards

Ganesh

  Reply With Quote

Old   February 3, 2006, 04:40
Default Re: Negative Pressure
  #3
al
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dear Mohammad, I am agree with ganesh, you should first to validate your code for the invicid part. After that, you can start to worry about the viscous part.

Regarding FEM vs. FVM, these is a common discussion. In my view, most people in CFD are using FVM due to the embedded mass conservation property. On the other hand, people using FEM are more worry in finding the solution of the problem. A good solution will garanty mass conservation with a given accuracy. Depending on your problem or expectations, you can choose between FEM or FVM. However, to choose FVM due to its forced "conservative" property should not be the main argument.
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pressure BC for combustion chamber Giuki FLUENT 1 July 19, 2011 12:35
seeking for help about a room with negative pressure mengyue1 FLUENT 0 November 26, 2009 07:40
High pressure in rhopSonicFoam results in negative pressure shangzung OpenFOAM 0 November 5, 2009 04:24
negative pressure in cfx flar.t CFX 1 December 19, 2006 00:20
negative pressure mAx FLUENT 0 January 25, 2006 15:31


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:07.